Readiness — Potential Made Accountable: Retrospective

This six-post series explores readiness as a second-order relational property, showing how explicit attention to relational capacity resolves pathologies across physics, mathematics, and philosophy.

---

Internal Logic and Relational Moves

1. Post 1 — Readiness: From Potential to Second-Order Property

   • Introduces readiness as formalised potential.

   • Distinguishes inclination (tendencies) from ability (capacity).

   • Establishes horizon and effective dimensionality as core relational concepts.

2. Post 2 — When Readiness Collapses: Singularities Revisited

   • Applies readiness to physics.

   • Shows singularities as points where ability → 0 but inclination persists → divergence.

   • Reframes infinities as epistemic diagnostics, not metaphysical facts.

3. Post 3 — Mathematics as Inclination Without Ability

   • Diagnoses divergence in mathematics as formal inclination exceeding relational capacity.

   • Reveals hidden assumptions (continuity, differentiability, persistence) as implicit readiness assumptions.

   • Connects mathematical pathologies to singularities in physics.

4. Post 4 — Dualism and the Mislocation of Readiness

   • Maps readiness onto Cartesian mind/world separation.

   • Shows hard problems of consciousness, meaning, and value as signals of exiled relational capacity.

   • Highlights structural parallels between philosophical and physical pathologies.

5. Post 5 — Modelling Practice: Checking Readiness Explicitly

   • Moves from diagnosis to practice.

   • Horizon exhaustion and readiness checks as explicit constraints in modelling.

   • Interprets renormalisation, gauge freedom, and shifts of construal as practical readiness management.

   • Reclaims modelling as accountable semiotic practice.

6. Post 6 — Readiness as a Unifying Lens

   • Synthesises the series.

   • Over-closure, mislocated ontology, and divergence are recurring expressions of neglected readiness.

   • Readiness restores relation as primary, bridging mathematics, physics, and philosophy.

   • Gestures toward semiotics, complex systems, and relational thinking as future applications.

---

Recurring Threads

1. Over-Closure

   • Singularities, divergences, and hard problems all reflect a contraction of potential space.

2. Inclination vs Ability

   • Inclination encodes formal tendencies; ability represents relational capacity.

   • Pathologies arise when inclination persists despite collapsed ability.

3. Relation as Primary

   • All actualisations occur within relational horizons.

   • Readiness makes this relational structure explicit, transforming formal or conceptual pathologies into accountable signals.

4. Epistemic Accountability

   • Divergence and collapse are diagnostic, not ontological.

   • Modelling becomes a relational practice, responsive to horizon and potential, rather than a metaphysical assertion.

---

Series Payoff

By foregrounding readiness, the series:

• Provides a single explanatory lens for previously disparate pathologies in physics, mathematics, and philosophy.

• Reframes singularities, divergences, and hard problems as informative signals about the limits of relational potential, not cosmic or metaphysical mysteries.

• Establishes a foundation for relationally accountable modelling, where inclination is always checked against ability.

• Opens pathways to future applications in semiotics, complex systems, and relational ontology.