1. The Recurring Pattern
Across physics, mathematics, and dualistic philosophy, a single structural pattern emerges:
-
Over-closure: potential space is consumed without leaving axes for further actualisation.
-
Mislocated ontology: divergence, hard problems, or infinities are treated as intrinsic features of the world or mind.
-
Formal divergence: mathematical systems continue to evolve despite collapsed relational capacity.
These phenomena are not isolated pathologies; they are the diagnostic signature of neglected readiness.
2. Readiness Makes Relation Explicit
By foregrounding readiness:
-
Relation is primary: all formal moves, all actualisations, exist within a structured horizon of potential.
-
Inclination and ability: we see clearly when formal tendencies outrun the system’s capacity to actualise them.
-
Horizons: divergence or collapse is no longer mysterious—it signals the boundaries of relational possibility.
Readiness transforms previously intractable problems into accountable signals about the structure of the system.
3. Connecting Domains
-
Physics: singularities and wavefunction collapse are not metaphysical infinities but points of horizon exhaustion.
-
Mathematics: divergences reveal where formal inclination exceeds relational capacity; continuity, differentiability, and persistence are implicit readiness assumptions.
-
Dualism: hard problems of consciousness and meaning arise from exiled relational axes; mind and world appear separate because relational capacity has been formally displaced.
Across all three, readiness provides the same diagnostic lens, uniting over-closure, mislocated ontology, and divergence.
4. Implications for Modelling and Thought
Readiness reshapes how we approach:
-
Scientific modelling: check horizons, track potential axes, and recognise exhaustion as epistemic information.
-
Philosophical reasoning: locate and restore relational capacity rather than positing metaphysical extremes.
-
Mathematics and computation: interpret formal divergence as signal, not ontological assertion.
It turns models into relationally accountable semiotic practices, not metaphysical pronouncements.
5. Forward Gesture
The readiness lens opens multiple avenues:
-
Semiotic theory: readiness could formalise the potential for meaning across systems of construal.
-
Complex systems: horizon exhaustion and relational capacity may guide adaptive modelling.
-
Interdisciplinary coherence: physics, mathematics, and philosophy can be interpreted under a single relational grammar of actualisation.
By treating readiness explicitly, we unify formerly disconnected pathologies and provide a constructive framework for future relational thinking.
Takeaway: Readiness is the bridge between formal inclination and relational reality. It explains singularities, divergences, and hard problems, restores coherence, and repositions modelling as accountable semiotic practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment