“Quantum potential is not a latent property hidden inside particles; it emerges in the interplay between horizon, metabolism, and ecology.”
In previous explorations, we applied readiness to quantum systems: we saw that what a system is ready to actualise depends on its context, measurements, and relational interactions. Now, by bringing the full triadic model of horizon, metabolism, and ecology into play, we can deepen this insight.
Horizon: Readiness in Quantum Systems
At the quantum level, the horizon represents the relational field in which a system exists—the configuration of measurement apparatus, boundary conditions, and entanglements with other systems. Readiness in this sense describes the quantum states that are poised to emerge given these contextual alignments.
A photon passing through a polarising filter, for instance, is ready to adopt certain polarisation states—not because it contains all possibilities equally, but because the horizon of interactions makes some outcomes immediately accessible and others not. Readiness here is perspectival and relational: it is always a response to the system’s environment.
Metabolism: Inclination in Quantum Systems
Metabolic disposition is subtler at the quantum scale but no less real. It represents the system’s internal tendencies, encoded in its dynamics and interaction history. This is inclination: the bias of potentialities shaped by prior entanglements, interference patterns, and internal couplings.
For example, the probability amplitudes in a superposition can be seen as reflecting inclination—they show the system’s weighted tendencies toward different outcomes relative to its relational history. Inclination is directional but not deterministic; it shapes the flow of potential without guaranteeing which event will actualise.
Ecology: Ability in Quantum Systems
Finally, ability corresponds to the concrete constraints and affordances that make certain outcomes feasible. At the quantum scale, these are the physical laws, symmetries, conservation constraints, and energetic bounds that govern what can emerge in a given interaction.
Even if a system is ready (horizon) and inclined (metabolic), certain outcomes remain impossible if they violate ecological constraints. Ability is the domain of feasibility—it defines the boundaries of actualisation within the relational ecology.
Triadic Profiles of Quantum Potential
Viewed this way, quantum potential is never an intrinsic “mystery” of a particle. It is always perspectival, relational, and contextual:
-
Horizon → Readiness: Which states can emerge in the present relational field?
-
Metabolism → Inclination: Which outcomes are favoured by the system’s dynamics and history?
-
Ecology → Ability: Which actualisations are physically feasible within the governing laws?
Different quantum experiments, entanglements, or measurements reveal different profiles of potential. Some outcomes are poised but forbidden by conservation laws; others are favoured by interference patterns but inaccessible in the current experimental configuration. True quantum potential is the interplay of all three dimensions.
Reflection
By mapping quantum potential onto a horizon/metabolic/ecological model, we gain a richer, relational understanding:
-
Potential is never intrinsic.
-
Actualisation depends on relational alignment (horizon), systemic disposition (metabolism), and contextual feasibility (ecology).
-
Quantum phenomena like superposition, interference, and entanglement are manifestations of this triadic relational dance, not metaphysical paradoxes.
“Quantum systems do not carry hidden potential—they enact possibility only through their relation to horizons, dispositions, and ecological constraints.”
This perspective allows us to reinterpret quantum uncertainty and superposition: they are not mysterious gaps in reality, but relational landscapes of potential, where actualisation is contingent, perspectival, and structured by the triad of horizon, metabolism, and ecology.