When Liora stepped back through the doorway at the edge of her garden, she half-expected the ordinary world to greet her as if nothing had changed.
Reality as unfolding relation, where process and perspective co-constitute being
Wednesday, 12 November 2025
The Lantern of Returning Light: 1 The Lantern of Returning Light
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: 5 Liora and the Valley of Reflected Light
When Liora stepped back through the doorway at the edge of her garden, she half-expected the ordinary world to greet her as if nothing had changed. But the valley seemed different — quieter, more luminous, as if the air itself remembered the impossible staircases, the mirrored corridors, and the spiralling prism she had traversed.
Her lantern, once a simple glow, now pulsed gently with awareness, attuned to the patterns of light and reflection in the world. Dew on the grass shimmered like jewels, tree branches arched in fractal rhythms, and shadows twisted subtly in impossible directions — all inviting attention, all alive with potential.
Liora walked through the valley, noticing for the first time the relational harmonies hidden in ordinary things: the way sunlight refracted through a spider’s web, the shifting pattern of clouds, the echo of her own footsteps in the hollow of the hills. Each perception felt like a thread connecting her to the larger field of being, a reflection of the impossible hall harmonised into the familiar.
A small group of children appeared, playing in the grass. They paused as Liora approached, drawn to the lantern’s soft radiance. She smiled and held it high. The light refracted into a thousand miniature prisms, and each child saw not just illumination, but a map of patterns and possibilities, subtle yet profound.
From the garden, a gentle wind carried the faintest echo of the hall: whispers of stairs that twisted, mirrors that multiplied, jewels that reflected infinity. Liora listened, knowing that the lessons of the impossible were not gone — they had been integrated. The journey had transformed her perception: she now saw the extraordinary in the ordinary, the relational in the material, and the light in every moment of attention.
As the sun dipped, turning the sky into a kaleidoscope of gold and violet, Liora lifted her lantern once more. Its glow intertwined with the valley, with the children, with herself. The impossible had become lived reality: a field of relational perception, alignment, and wonder — a luminous continuum in which every step, every glance, every reflection was a participant in the dance of meaning.
And somewhere, just beyond sight, the spiral, the maze, the prism — and the Guardian of Shattered Light — winked, reminding her that the adventure was never truly over. Every day held a new threshold, every perception a new pattern, every reflection a new possibility.
Liora smiled, and the valley — shimmering, reflective, alive — smiled back.
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: 4 Liora and the Spiral of Infinite Light
The staircase from the Guardian’s chamber dissolved beneath her feet as Liora stepped into a new realm. She found herself on a spiralling platform suspended in air, twisting and folding like the inside of a kaleidoscope. Gravity no longer obeyed a single direction: steps curved sideways, jewels hovered like planets, and mirrored walls stretched into infinity. Each movement shifted the field; each glance reoriented the world.
At the centre of this spiral floated a towering prism of sparkling gems, rotating endlessly. Its facets refracted everything — Liora, the stairs, the sky, and the stars — into infinite possibilities. The hall had become a world of relational patterns, a place where perception, attention, and reflection were themselves the terrain to navigate.
A voice echoed from the prism:
“To reach the summit, you must see all paths and choose none. To step forward, you must move as if all directions are true.”
Liora breathed deeply. She understood now that the challenge was not to find a single correct route, but to align herself with the patterns themselves. She began to move, letting her attention flow with the shimmering pathways of light, her lantern guiding her not by illumination, but by resonance.
Reflections of herself from the maze and the Guardian’s chamber swirled around her, merging and splitting, guiding her through each impossible curve. She realised the spiral was alive — it responded to her awareness. When she moved with clarity, the stairs stabilised; when she hesitated, the path twisted and threatened to vanish.
At last, she reached the apex, where the prism glowed with a light that seemed to emanate from every jewel at once. Liora raised her lantern, and the glow intertwined with the prism. The impossible space collapsed gently into a harmonious mosaic: all staircases, mirrors, and reflections aligned. She saw herself, the hall, and the jewels as one luminous pattern — a field of relational perception where observer and world co-arise.
A final voice, softer than before, whispered:
“You have learned that navigation is not control, but attunement; that vision is not certainty, but relational presence; and that light is not a thing, but a way of being.”
The spiral dissolved, leaving her on a simple platform overlooking a valley of shimmering jewels, each reflecting the sky, the hall, and the spiral she had traversed. Liora smiled, understanding that her journey was not an escape, but a deepening: the impossible was always present, and the task was to move attentively through the patterns of perception.
The prism above shimmered one last time, then became a constellation of points in the air — a reminder that the journey never truly ends, but transforms as light, reflection, and awareness converge.
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: 3 Liora and the Guardian of Shattered Light
After the maze, Liora ascended a staircase that spiralled impossibly through the hall. The steps folded back upon themselves, some climbing into the ceiling, others descending at angles that made her stomach lurch. Jewels floated in midair, refracting shards of light across mirrored walls. Every step seemed to multiply the possibilities of where she might land next.
At the top of the spiral, a vast chamber opened. Its floor was made of tessellated mirrors, each reflecting not the hall, but fragments of the world outside — clouds, trees, rivers, and her own garden. In the centre stood a figure, neither entirely solid nor entirely reflected: the Guardian of Shattered Light. Its body was a lattice of floating mirrors, jewelled shards, and refracted beams, constantly shifting perspective.
The Guardian spoke without moving its lips:
“Who walks the impossible stairs must prove that perception is more than sight.”
Liora stepped forward, lantern in hand. She realised that to reach the next stage of her journey, she would have to align her attention with the patterns of the chamber, to navigate not only space, but relational perception itself.
The Guardian’s first trial appeared: the mirrored floor shifted, forming a vast grid of impossible angles. Steps appeared and disappeared at random. Some mirrors reflected Liora as she truly was, others twisted her image grotesquely. Jewels flickered with possibilities, offering paths that might be right — or might lead to a sudden fall through an invisible gap.
She remembered the lessons of the maze: step with awareness, follow shimmer, and trust relational alignment over certainty. Slowly, she began to move across the mirrors, noticing that the fractured reflections responded to her focus. Mirrors that she ignored dissolved; jewels she observed guided her through. The Guardian’s eyes — if it had eyes — seemed to shine with approval as she threaded through the shifting patterns.
At the chamber’s centre, Liora faced her final challenge: a mirrored arch that reflected all the versions of herself she had met in the maze. They stepped forward, their eyes questioning, daring her to recognise that she was both one and many, observer and participant. She hesitated, then lifted her lantern. Its soft glow extended to each reflection, touching every Liora simultaneously. In that light, all the fragmented selves folded together, forming a single, whole presence.
The Guardian’s voice echoed:
“You have seen yourself in the many, and chosen the one that moves forward with attention. The hall bends to those who perceive truly.”
The mirrors shifted one final time, opening a staircase that rose into a chamber of glittering jewels, each a new threshold, each a promise of further wonder. Liora climbed, heart steady, knowing that the true journey was learning to see and align with the patterns that make the impossible navigable.
And somewhere deep within the hall, the Guardian shimmered and vanished, leaving only the faint trace of a reflection that seemed to wink at her: a promise that the trials ahead would be even more wondrous, if she kept her mind open and her attention luminous.
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: 2 Liora and the Maze of Mirrored Possibilities
Liora had climbed higher than she thought possible, stepping along staircases that bent like ribbons in the air. Above her, the jewelled chandeliers spun faster now, scattering light into fractal patterns that multiplied endlessly. Each turn revealed another mirrored corridor — and each mirror held a version of herself, some smiling, some frowning, some whispering secrets she could almost understand.
Then she stepped through an archway, and the hall changed entirely. She was no longer on staircases alone: she was inside a mirror maze, a labyrinth of endless reflections. Every wall was a mirror; every corridor split her image into infinite possibilities. She could see herself walking left, right, upside down, or even floating. Some reflections seemed to watch her with intent, as if they knew more than she did.
A jewel embedded in a distant wall flickered and pulsed like a heartbeat. Liora realised that each jewel represented a path forward, but choosing one was impossible without discernment. Every choice seemed to create new reflections, and every reflection threatened to mislead her.
Then she remembered the lesson from the shifting stairs: attention, not certainty, would guide her. She breathed, focusing on the shimmer of one jewel. Slowly, she took a step toward it. As she walked, the mirrors responded: some softened, others blurred, creating a corridor that had not existed a moment before.
Suddenly, one of her reflections stepped forward — not as a reflection, but as a separate Liora, bright-eyed and earnest.
“You must trust the paths you cannot see,” it said.“Your choices create the hall. Your attention aligns the mirrors. Only together can we find the exit.”
Liora nodded. She realised that the maze was alive — it was not meant to trap her, but to teach her the rhythm of relation. Step by step, she and her mirrored companion navigated the corridors. Sometimes they split, exploring two pathways at once; sometimes they merged, their reflections folding into one clarity.
At last, they reached a chamber where the kaleidoscopic tiles rotated in perfect synchrony, forming a star-shaped pattern. A jewel the size of a sun hung at the centre, radiating a calm, steady light. Liora stepped into its glow, and the maze paused. The mirrors reflected her exactly as she was, not multiplied, not fragmented — whole and aligned.
The mirrored companion smiled and faded into the light.
“You are learning,” it whispered. “Every reflection is a lesson. Every choice is a creation. And every jewel shows the way forward.”
Liora breathed deeply. She had survived the maze, not by brute force or certainty, but by attentive perception, relational awareness, and playful courage. She knew the journey had only just begun, and the hall of impossible spaces awaited still greater wonders — and challenges.
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: 1 Liora and the Hall of Shifting Steps
Liora had never seen a place like it. She stepped through a door that had appeared at the edge of her garden — though she was certain there had been nothing there a moment before — and found herself in a vast hall.
The walls were mirrors, but not as she knew them. Each reflection moved independently: when she raised her hand, one mirrored version waved, another clutched at the air, and a third seemed to look through her entirely. Stairs climbed at impossible angles: some floated upside down, some folded into themselves, and some led into other staircases that appeared only when she wasn’t looking directly at them.
Above, chandeliers made of sparkling jewels rotated slowly, casting refracted light into patterns that rearranged the hall with each shift of perspective. The floor under her feet trembled with kaleidoscopic motion, as if the tiles themselves were deciding what direction gravity should point.
A voice, neither near nor far, whispered:
“To walk is to choose, to choose is to move, to move is to become lost — and to be lost is the first step.”
Liora took a careful step. Immediately, a new staircase arched overhead, leading to a mirrored platform where her reflection stood, smiling in a way she had never smiled herself. She realised that every step she took changed the hall: the mirrors reconfigured, the tiles shimmered differently, the staircases rearranged. Nothing was fixed; everything was alive with possibility.
She paused at a landing. Below, a kaleidoscope of doors flickered open and closed, each showing a different version of the hall: some upside down, some sideways, some full of sparkling corridors lined with jewels. She sensed a challenge: to move forward, she would have to trust her own sense of orientation, even as the world refused to settle.
Remembering the lantern from her dreams, she closed her eyes and imagined its soft, steady glow filling the hall. When she opened them, the staircases still twisted in impossible ways, but the jewels above caught her light, creating faint threads — paths she could follow. Step by step, Liora learned to walk with attention rather than certainty, to navigate by shimmer rather than gravity, to let her reflection guide her without confusing her.
And as she climbed, she noticed something magical: the hall responded. Mirrors bent to show hidden routes, tiles rotated to form new landings, and the voice whispered again:
“Every choice is a window. Every reflection is a map. Every jewel is a compass. Keep moving, and you will find what you did not know you sought.”
Liora smiled. Though she did not yet know the end of the hall, she had taken the first step of the journey, and that was enough.
The adventure had begun.
Liora and the Hall of Shimmering Paths: Series Preface
This series of stories continues the explorations begun in the Lantern and Seeing Meaning series, bringing relational ontology into a mythic, kaleidoscopic narrative. Here, meaning, perception, and attention are not abstract concepts but lived through story, in a world where mirrors, jewels, and impossible geometries reflect the dynamic interplay between observer, environment, and semiotic field.
The protagonist, Liora, enters a hall where perspective shifts, stairs fold impossibly, mirrors multiply reality, and jewelled light fractures endlessly. Through her journey, readers witness a hero’s cycle of challenge, trial, insight, and integration, where the impossible is navigated not by force or certainty, but by attentive perception, relational alignment, and imaginative play.
Key themes threaded through the series:
-
Perspective and Reflection — Mirrors and kaleidoscopes symbolise the multiplicity of perception, showing that observation is inseparable from relational context.
-
Relational Navigation — Impossible stairs and shifting platforms dramatise the process of moving through complex fields of potential, teaching readers that choice is grounded in awareness rather than fixed direction.
-
Attention as Agency — Jewels, refracted light, and spirals highlight that insight emerges through focus, not mere movement; meaning is actively actualised.
-
Integration and Return — The final stories show that the extraordinary, once perceived and embodied, transforms ordinary experience: the hero returns with a newly attuned consciousness, capable of seeing patterns and possibilities invisible to the unobservant eye.
This series invites readers — children and adults alike — to explore a world where perception and meaning are entwined, where imagination illuminates relational patterns, and where the boundaries of the possible are shaped by attention and insight. It is a celebration of curiosity, wonder, and the luminous journey of learning to navigate the extraordinary in every moment.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: Afterword: Reading the Lantern Myth
The cycle of Liora, the lantern, the river, and the mountain is more than a children’s tale. Each narrative encodes key dimensions of a relational ontology through symbolic and perceptual metaphor:
-
The Lantern as ConstrualThe lantern is never merely an object of illumination; it is the act of bringing potential into patterned awareness. Its golden and silver lights in the dreams and the river sequence signify the differentiation of perspective, the interplay of attention and reflection, and the emergence of meaning through relational alignment.
-
Liora as InstanceThe child represents the actualising perspective — the instance that traverses potential fields, co-constituting experience. Her agency is not independent but relational: the world responds to her, and she is reshaped by it, illustrating the perspectival cline between potential and actualisation.
-
The Mountain and the River as SystemsThese elemental figures embody structured potential — the enduring relational systems of the valley. Their listening and murmuring demonstrate how systems maintain alignment, encode histories of interaction, and actualise meaning when engaged by an instance.
-
Light and Shadow as Relational DynamicsGolden and silver light, shadow, and shimmer are semiotic strata made perceptible: attention, temporality, and evaluative resonance are encoded symbolically in the landscape, highlighting that meaning is not carried by objects but emerges through co-constitution.
-
The Valley as Emergent FieldThe convergence in “The Night the Valley Dreamed Itself” and the dispersal in “The Lantern’s Return” show systemic reflexivity: when instances, systems, and semiotic potentials align, a relational field arises, wherein meaning is emergent, distributed, and participatory.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: 5 The Lantern’s Return
When the last story ended, the valley had dreamed itself awake. The mist still held the shapes of mountains and rivers like breath before speech. In the hush between night and dawn, a small light flickered in the grass — not the old lantern itself, but what the lantern had become: a pulse of memory where seeing and being were the same.
A child came walking barefoot through dew. She did not carry the lantern. The lantern carried her — as shimmer, as sense, as the rhythm of her steps against the earth. Each time her foot touched the ground, the field brightened: fern, stone, air, skin, each glowed with quiet recognition.
The valley deepened in colour. Trees, insects, birds — each woke not as separate beings but as rhythms in the same breathing pattern. The world was composing itself, phrase by phrase, in the grammar of relation.
The child lifted her eyes and saw that the light no longer came from a single flame. Every surface was lantern now — not reflecting light but construing it, each from its own angle, each from within its own participation.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: 4 The Night the Valley Dreamed Itself
It began quietly, the way all beginnings do—so softly that no one was sure whether it had begun at all.
The valley lay in half-sleep. Mist curled over the river; stars trembled like thoughts that had not yet chosen their meaning. The Mountain listened, as it always did. The River murmured to itself, remembering the touch of light and shadow. And in her small home by the water, Liora dreamed.
In her dream, she saw her lantern hovering in the sky, its light neither golden nor silver now, but the slow shimmer of being itself. From that light spread ripples—not beams, but patterns of attention. Each ripple touched something in the valley, and as it did, the thing began to hear itself.
Then the Mountain spoke, its voice deep as dawn:
“I am not above you. I am the patience of your echoes.”
The River replied, weaving words from reflection:
“And I am not below you. I am the memory of your listening.”
Their voices met in the air, twining like currents. The sound reached Liora in her sleep, and she rose within the dream, lantern in hand. Its light did not shine on things now—it shone between them. Everywhere it touched, boundaries softened, and the valley became a single breathing pattern, pulsing with mutual awareness.
Liora walked to the riverbank, her lantern pulsing in rhythm with the mountain’s breath.
“So this is what it means to see,” she whispered. “Not to find, but to feel ourselves finding together.”
And the valley, half-in dream, half-in waking, answered her—not in words, but in a deep, luminous hush, the sound of everything recognising everything else.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: 3 The Mountain That Listened
Long before anyone remembered names, the Mountain stood at the edge of the valley, vast and patient. It had watched rivers carve their silver threads, and trees lean toward the light, and clouds gather and drift like thoughts unspoken.
It was content to stand—to hold the horizon steady—until the night Liora’s lantern first met the River of Shadows.
When the two lights rose and mingled in the air, their song brushed against the Mountain’s stone skin. The Mountain, for the first time, heard.
At first it didn’t know what hearing meant. It only felt a trembling, deep in its roots—a pattern of differences, a rhythm that wasn’t its own. Then the wind shifted, and carried with it the valley’s voices: the creak of wooden doors, the cry of a newborn, the hush of grass bending in the dark.
Each sound entered the Mountain and stayed. They echoed, not as noise but as feeling. The Mountain began to understand that every sound was a way of being—the voice of the world learning its contours through vibration.
Each sound left a trace within it—a faint resonance that shaped the way the Mountain would echo the next. Its stillness was not emptiness, but the patient weaving of every sound that touched it.
One evening, when Liora climbed the slopes with her shimmering lantern, she rested on a ledge and asked aloud,
“Do you ever speak, old Mountain?”
The Mountain thought for a long while. Then a breeze rose from the valley, carrying the distant murmur of the river, the whisper of leaves, the sigh of dusk. The Mountain let them pass through its heart, then released them together, reshaped.
The wind that reached Liora’s ear sounded like this:
“What you call speaking, I call remembering.What you call silence, I call becoming.”
Liora smiled and placed her lantern beside a stone. Its light entered the cracks, tracing the edges where rock met air. For a moment, the Mountain glowed—not with borrowed light, but with the warmth of its own listening.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: 2 Beyond the River: The Dream of the Two Lights
That night, after her meeting with the River of Shadows, Liora dreamt that her lantern floated above her bed, humming softly, as though remembering something it had never forgotten.
They drifted into the valley air like fireflies learning their names.
The golden light flew upward, delighted by everything it could see: the gleam of rooftops, the dew on leaves, the sheen of moonlit snow high on the mountain peaks. Wherever it went, the world became vivid and sure, drawn into clear edges and radiant forms. “This is what is,” it sang, bright and confident. “This is the way the world must be.”
But the silver light lingered closer to the earth. It glided through the quiet fields and listened to the soil. It peered into wells, into shadows under the eaves, into the glimmer of fish sleeping beneath ice. “This is what might be,” it whispered. “What hides in plain sight, what waits in the dark to be named.”
At first, they each felt complete. But as the night deepened, the golden light noticed something strange: its brightness began to hollow out. The more it shone, the less it felt. Its certainty grew lonely. And the silver light, wandering in soft reflection, found its glow dimming into mist—it could sense everything, but touch nothing. Possibility without shape.
They began to call to each other across the valley.
“Without you,” said the golden light, “the world is bright but brittle.”“Without you,” replied the silver, “the world is deep but lost.”
Their voices trembled in the air until they met at the river’s edge. There, the water mirrored both lights perfectly—and for a moment, the river itself seemed to pause, waiting.
When Liora awoke, that same shimmer filled her room. Her lantern sat quietly by the window, neither golden nor silver now, but alive with both.
She didn’t remember the dream exactly. But when she looked out at the mountains, she noticed how every shadow glowed faintly at its edge, and how every beam of light carried a hint of darkness in its heart.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: 1 The Lantern and the River of Shadows
In a valley that dreamed between mountains, there was a small village where dusk lasted longer than anywhere else. The sun would sink behind the peaks, yet the sky stayed violet, as though the world couldn’t decide whether to end the day or begin the night.
In that in-between light lived Liora, a child who carried a little lantern wherever she went. It wasn’t an ordinary lantern. It didn’t burn with oil or wick, but with a quiet gleam that seemed to notice things. When Liora tilted it toward the trees, every leaf shimmered with a story; when she aimed it at the ground, pebbles and puddles whispered in their own soft tones.
But there was one place the lantern never shone—the River of Shadows, winding just beyond the edge of the village. No one crossed it after dusk, for it was said that the river remembered every forgotten thing, and that its waters showed you not what was there, but what you’d refused to see.
One evening, when the violet lingered too long and her curiosity burned brighter than her fear, Liora followed the river’s sound. The closer she came, the dimmer her lantern grew, until it flickered like a heartbeat. Then she heard the river speak—not in words, but in ripples that shaped a meaning inside her.
“What you call light is only half the world,” it murmured. “Would you like to see the rest?”
Liora hesitated. The lantern trembled in her hands, unsure whether to glow or go dark. She knelt and dipped it into the water. The flame didn’t drown—it divided. Two lights rose from the lantern: one golden, one silver. They hovered above the current, each revealing a different side of the same scene. The golden light showed the bright, waking world—the reflections of mountains, the sparkle of fish. The silver light showed the dreaming world—the same shapes, but folded inward, glowing from within.
When she lifted the lantern again, both lights flowed back together, mingling into a soft pearlescent glow. The river quieted, and the valley sighed in its sleep. From then on, whenever Liora walked through the village, her lantern no longer only illuminated things; it listened. The villagers said her light had grown gentler, but deeper—like dawn seen from underwater.
Mythic Light — Stories of Construal and Luminous Worlds: Series Preface
This interlude series of children’s stories continues the thematic explorations of the Lantern series and the Seeing Meaning framework, translating relational ontology into mythic narrative and perceptual imagination. Where the previous series examined meaning as a reflexive alignment — the act of differentiation and co-constitution within the luminous field of construal — this collection embodies these principles through story, landscape, and symbolic character.
Here, the lantern is not merely an object but a metaphor for construal itself: the means by which potential patterns are brought into attention, enacted through perception, interaction, and relational alignment. Liora, the river, the mountain, and the valley enact different strata of the ontology: instance, system, semiotic field, and emergent relational pattern. Together, their journeys dramatise how meaning emerges, flows, and disperses, not as a static property of objects, but as an ongoing dialogue between observer, world, and symbolic mediation.
The series builds sequentially:
-
The Lantern and the River of Shadows — the awakening of perception and relational potential.
-
Beyond the River: The Dream of the Two Lights — differentiation, reflection, and the interplay of perspective.
-
The Mountain That Listened — the enduring system of the world responding to and aligning with perception.
-
The Night the Valley Dreamed Itself — collective emergence: system, instance, and semiotic field in co-constitution.
-
The Lantern’s Return — dispersal, reflexivity, and the pervasive luminosity of relational meaning.
Together, these tales form a mythic bridge: connecting the analytical insights of Seeing Meaning with the imaginative and symbolic register of storytelling. They allow the ontology to be felt, not merely reasoned — showing that meaning, like light, is not only something to be observed, but something to be enacted, shared, and lived.
Stylisation and Visual Metaphor: 3 Stylisation, Modality, and Visual Metaphor — An Integrated Framework
Having examined degrees of iconicity and modalities as engines of visual metaphor, we now synthesise these insights into a coherent framework. Visual meaning is generated not only through relational perception but also through the interplay of stylisation and the metaphorical potential of each modality.
1. Iconicity and Stylisation as Semiotic Parameters
-
Naturalistic / high iconicity: Forms resemble perceptual reality, promoting immersion and direct identification.
-
Stylised / moderate iconicity: Simplification or exaggeration foregrounds salient features, enhancing affective or narrative impact.
-
Schematic / low iconicity: Abstraction amplifies interpretive and metaphorical engagement, prioritising relational and evaluative meaning over perceptual fidelity.
Degrees of iconicity function as semiotic parameters that modulate how each modality contributes to meaning. Stylisation does not reduce clarity; it redirects attention, structures temporal flow, and shapes metaphorical interpretation.
2. Modalities as Distinct and Relational Semiotic Channels
-
Shape: Curvature, angularity, scale, and distortion encode affective and evaluative relations.
-
Colour: Hue, saturation, and brightness modulate emotional, moral, and symbolic significance.
-
Motion / trajectory: Speed, direction, and kinetic exaggeration structure narrative and relational interpretation.
-
Depth / spatial organisation: Proximity, perspective, and vanishing points guide attention, hierarchy, and relational positioning.
-
Sound: Tone, rhythm, and timbre integrate with visual channels to reinforce or contrast metaphorical meaning.
These channels operate both independently and relationally, producing emergent metaphorical effects across the semiotic field.
3. Interaction of Stylisation and Modality
-
In stylised or schematic forms, simplified shapes or exaggerated gestures make metaphorical relations more salient.
-
Colour and lighting can be exaggerated or symbolically codified to convey affect or moral value.
-
Motion lines, trajectory exaggeration, or compressed temporal sequences enhance narrative clarity and relational metaphor.
-
Depth and perspective can be manipulated to foreground key elements or relational dynamics.
Systemically, stylisation acts as a semiotic lens, shaping how modalities generate and align metaphorical meaning in the viewer’s perceptual field.
4. Analytic Consequences
-
Predictive insight: We can anticipate how different degrees of iconicity and modality choices affect immersion, attention, and evaluative reading.
-
Comparative analysis: Stylised versus naturalistic media can be assessed for metaphorical density, relational clarity, and affective impact.
-
Multimodal synthesis: Recognises that metaphor is distributed across channels, actualised in relational alignment and embodied perception.
-
Pedagogical relevance: Particularly in children’s media, stylisation guides interpretive engagement, scaffolds narrative understanding, and supports affective learning.
5. Towards a Relational Semiotics of Stylisation and Metaphor
-
Emergent: No single element carries meaning in isolation; it arises from alignment across channels and the viewer’s participatory construal.
-
Flexible: Stylisation and modality choices can emphasise different relational, temporal, or evaluative effects.
-
Relationally grounded: Meaning depends on immersion, attention, temporality, and the semiotic configuration of the perceptual field.
This framework extends the original Seeing Meaning series by integrating iconicity, stylisation, and modality into a systematic account of visual metaphor, offering both analytic precision and practical applicability for designers, educators, and scholars.
Series Conclusion: Special Integration
-
Clarified that iconicity is a continuum, with naturalistic, stylised, and schematic forms each generating distinct semiotic effects.
-
Mapped the independent and relational metaphorical potential of shape, colour, motion, depth, and sound.
-
Synthesised these insights into an integrated framework where stylisation modulates modality, and modality actualises metaphor, producing relational meaning in perception and attention.
Visual media, whether in children’s picture books or animated narratives, are thus semiotic fields in which stylistic, perceptual, temporal, and evaluative dimensions converge — actualising meaning in relational, embodied, and metaphorical ways.
Stylisation and Visual Metaphor: 2 Modalities as Engines of Visual Metaphor
Building on our discussion of degrees of iconicity, we now examine how each visual (and audiovisual) modality can independently and relationally generate metaphorical meaning. Whereas verbal metaphor maps between conceptual domains through lexicogrammar, visual metaphor emerges from the interaction of perceptual channels and the viewer’s embodied construal.
1. Shape and Form
-
Curvature vs angularity: Curved forms often convey softness, gentleness, or approachability; angular forms can signal danger, tension, or rigidity.
-
Scale and proportion: Exaggerated size may imply importance, threat, or dominance; miniature forms may signal vulnerability or intimacy.
-
Distortion or simplification: Stylisation can heighten relational or emotional interpretation, turning perceptual features into evaluative or narrative tokens.
Shape operates semiotically like experiential lexicogrammar: it construes relations, actions, and qualities within the visual field.
2. Colour and Light
-
Hue: Red can signify passion, danger, or intensity; blue can signify calm, distance, or melancholy.
-
Saturation and brightness: Intense, high-contrast colour often draws attention and amplifies affect; muted or desaturated tones convey subtlety, reflection, or decay.
-
Symbolic association: Cultural conventions layer additional meaning onto perceptual effects, creating relationally anchored value tokens.
Colour, like interpersonal meaning in language, shapes how the viewer interprets relational and affective dynamics.
3. Motion and Trajectory
-
Acceleration and deceleration: Fast motion can signal excitement, chaos, or urgency; slow motion may suggest reflection, suspense, or deliberation.
-
Directionality: Upward motion often connotes growth, aspiration, or hope; downward motion can imply decline, fall, or loss.
-
Kinetic exaggeration: Stylised motion enhances interpretive clarity, allowing metaphorical meaning to emerge even in abstracted or schematic forms.
Motion functions analogously to textual sequencing in language, structuring narrative and relational interpretation across time.
4. Depth, Perspective, and Spatial Organisation
-
Foreground and background: Proximity can indicate salience, relational closeness, or importance; distance can suggest marginality, isolation, or hierarchy.
-
Vanishing points and converging lines: Depth cues guide attention and imply directionality or inevitability, contributing to narrative and affective meaning.
-
Spatial exaggeration: Altered or impossible perspectives can heighten metaphorical or symbolic resonance.
Spatial organisation functions like thematic structuring in language: it organises experiential and interpersonal relations within the semiotic field.
5. Sound and Multimodal Integration
-
Tone and timbre: Harsh or discordant sounds can signal tension; harmonic tones suggest harmony or emotional resolution.
-
Rhythm and tempo: Repetition, acceleration, or pause can mirror visual motion, emphasise narrative events, or modulate affective response.
-
Cross-modal interaction: Sound can reinforce or contrast visual cues, creating layered metaphorical meaning across modalities.
Sound interacts with visual modalities relationally, functioning like textual cohesion in language: it integrates multimodal elements into a unified semiotic event.
6. Analytic Implications
-
Analyse each channel for its unique evaluative and relational potential.
-
Examine how stylisation modulates the metaphorical power of shape, colour, motion, depth, and sound.
-
Recognise that metaphor in visual media is distributed and emergent: each modality contributes both independently and relationally to overall meaning.
Visual metaphor is thus not a property of isolated elements but a dynamic, multimodal phenomenon actualised in perception, attention, and relational construal.
Stylisation and Visual Metaphor: 1 Degrees of Iconicity in Visual Expression
In the previous series, we assumed that iconic visual expression tends toward naturalistic or perceptually continuous forms. Yet in many media — especially children’s picture books — images vary in their degree of iconicity, ranging from highly naturalistic to schematic, exaggerated, or abstracted. Understanding this continuum illuminates how stylisation modulates immersion, attention, and metaphorical potential.
1. Iconicity as a Continuum
-
High iconicity / naturalistic: Forms closely resemble perceptual reality; the viewer recognises objects, figures, and scenes as continuous with everyday perception.
-
Moderate iconicity / stylised: Forms simplify or exaggerate perceptual features, emphasising expressive or relational qualities over exact realism.
-
Low iconicity / schematic or abstracted: Forms prioritise symbolic, structural, or affective cues; resemblance to real-world perception is minimal, but relational and evaluative meaning can be intensified.
This continuum allows us to situate different visual strategies and examine their semiotic effects systematically.
2. Stylisation and Immersion
-
Naturalistic images promote immersion through perceptual continuity, enabling the viewer to “inhabit” the scene.
-
Stylised images may heighten emotional or cognitive engagement by foregrounding salient features (e.g., exaggerating facial expressions to convey affect).
-
Schematic/abstracted images encourage imaginative or interpretive participation, prompting the viewer to project meaning into minimal or symbolic forms.
Systemically, stylisation modulates the semiotic principle of immersion: it affects how the viewer is positioned and co-constitutes meaning within the perceptual field.
3. Stylisation and Temporality
-
Simplified or exaggerated forms can emphasise motion, gesture, or transformation more clearly than highly detailed naturalistic depictions.
-
Temporal cues in schematic images may be compressed or intensified, generating narrative and affective flow that is perceptually immediate but conceptually abstracted.
-
Naturalistic images often distribute temporal attention across detailed scenes, requiring the viewer to integrate multiple cues sequentially.
Thus, stylisation shapes the rhythm and focus of temporal alignment within the visual semiotic field.
4. Stylisation and Multimodality
-
Colour choices may be more symbolic or affectively charged in stylised or abstracted forms.
-
Spatial exaggeration (scale, perspective) can enhance relational or narrative significance.
-
Motion lines, simplified gesture, or symbolic shapes in schematic images guide attention and amplify metaphorical interpretation.
In this sense, iconicity and multimodality are mutually constraining: the degree of realism or abstraction in shape informs how colour, motion, and spatial cues generate meaning.
5. Analytic Implications
-
Stylisation is not a deficit relative to naturalism; it is a strategic semiotic choice that modulates immersion, relational positioning, and evaluative potential.
-
The iconicity continuum allows us to predict how images engage viewers differently — perceptually, emotionally, and cognitively.
-
In children’s media, lower iconicity often heightens clarity of narrative, affect, or metaphorical meaning, demonstrating the flexibility of the relational semiotic field.
By conceptualising iconicity as a continuum, we can extend the framework of Seeing Meaning to encompass a wider variety of visual strategies, showing how naturalistic, stylised, and schematic forms each actualise relational meaning in distinctive ways.
Stylisation and Visual Metaphor: Series Preface
This three-post extension of the Seeing Meaning series explores how visual media generate meaning through degrees of iconicity and the metaphorical potential of individual modalities. Moving beyond the assumption of naturalistic representation, the series examines how stylisation, abstraction, and schematic depiction shape immersion, temporal flow, relational alignment, and evaluative construal.
This extension provides a systematic framework for analysing and understanding how visual style, modality, and metaphor converge to produce rich, embodied, and relational meaning.
Seeing Meaning: 6 A Relational Semiotics of Visual Media
Having examined immersion, temporality, multimodality, and visual metaphor, we now synthesise these dimensions into a coherent relational framework. Visual meaning is not represented symbolically; it is actualised through the interplay of perception, attention, and evaluative construal.
1. Recapitulation of Strata
-
Immersion and perspective: Position the viewer within the perceptual environment, making observation participatory.
-
Temporality: Structures attention and transformation, turning sequential or animated elements into narrative and relational coherence.
-
Multimodality: Integrates shape, colour, motion, depth, and sound into patterns of emergent meaning.
-
Visual metaphor and value-tokenisation: Embed evaluative, affective, and aesthetic significance within the perceptual field.
Each stratum operates relationally: meaning emerges not from individual elements, but from their alignment and interaction.
2. The Viewer as Co-Constituent
-
The viewer’s perceptual orientation, attention, and embodied engagement are integral to meaning.
-
Spatial and temporal structures guide relational focus, while multimodal patterns orchestrate affective resonance.
-
Evaluative significance is actualised only through the viewer’s participatory construal.
Systemically, the viewer functions analogously to the lexicogrammatical system in language: a necessary stratum through which semiotic potential is realised.
3. Systemic Model of Visual Semiotics
| Stratum | Function | Analogy to SFL |
|---|---|---|
| Immersion & Perspective | Viewer positioning | Interpersonal meaning |
| Temporality | Sequential and dynamic structuring | Textual meaning |
| Multimodality | Integration of sensory channels | Experiential & textual meaning |
| Value-tokenisation | Evaluative and metaphorical significance | Experiential + interpersonal meaning |
The table illustrates how relational alignment across strata actualises semiotic potential, producing meaning as an emergent property of perception, attention, and evaluative construal.
4. Analytic Consequences
-
Visual meaning is relational and embodied; it cannot be reduced to symbolic coding.
-
Each stratum interacts dynamically, with temporal and multimodal structures modulating evaluative resonance.
-
Analysis requires attention to both perceptual affordances and the viewer’s participatory engagement.
-
The semiotic field is pre-grammatical: composition, attention, and alignment function analogously to grammatical systems in language.
Thus, the framework preserves SFL’s systemic-functional rigour while extending it to iconic-relational media.
5. Outlook: Towards Interactive and Virtual Media
-
Co-constitution becomes reciprocal: the viewer’s actions influence temporal, spatial, and multimodal dynamics.
-
Immersion, temporality, and multimodality are intensified, and evaluative construal is increasingly contingent on interaction.
-
Meaning remains emergent and relational, highlighting the adaptability of the semiotic system across new technological environments.
By integrating all strata, we see that visual media generate meaning not by representing the world symbolically, but by actualising relational construals through embodied perception, temporal sequencing, multimodal alignment, and evaluative interpretation.









