This post examines how a formalism can be preserved without obligating the field to continuous engagement.
Why Formalisms Need Rest
Every tool accumulates load as it is used:
-
distinctions are repeatedly mobilised
-
attention becomes dense
-
obligations spread unevenly across perspectives
Principles of Rest
1. Limit Application
2. Accept Partial Engagement
3. Preserve Modulation
Attenuate expectations, soften obligations, and allow non-closure to operate without compulsion.
4. Respect Residual Asymmetry
Rest as Adaptive Buffer
Rest functions like modulation at the meta-level:
-
it prevents burnout
-
it allows recovery of readiness
-
it preserves the integrity of distinctions
-
it sustains continued application without overextension
In short: rest is maintenance, not abandonment.
Risks of Ignoring Rest
Failure to let a formalism rest leads to:
-
meta-fatigue in users and audiences
-
compulsive extension of minimal distinctions
-
the impression that the theory must cover everything
-
saturation so severe that the field resists engagement
This is precisely the point at which a tool ceases to function as a tool.
Strategic Pause vs Abandonment
The calculus remains active, but its obligatory weight is suspended.
Preparing for Integration
Rest allows for the final post of the series:
Theory as One System Among OthersRecognising the calculus as part of a larger field, and releasing meta-privilege without abandoning rigor.
That post will close the arc, situating the formalism in a sustainable semiotic ecology.
No comments:
Post a Comment