This guide maps each symbolic element in Liora and the Three Mysteries of the Valley-Wind to the core concepts of the horizon/metabolic/ecological model and our relational ontology more broadly.
1. The Valley-Wind (the indivisible field)
Ontological function:
-
Represents the ecological field of potential — the shared readiness, inclination and ability spanning multiple loci.
-
Demonstrates entanglement as an ecological indivisibility rather than a connection between individuals.
-
Emphasises that the horizon of potential is distributed, not “owned” by particles or agents.
-
Dispels any implication of “spooky action”; the ecology is already unified.
2. The Cedar Tree (a distant locus inside the same horizon)
Ontological function:
-
Serves as a second locus of instantiation within the same ecological potential.
-
Illustrates how multiple instances share a horizon of readiness without being independently endowed with potentials.
-
Makes clear that separation in space does not imply separation in horizon.
3. Liora Kneeling to the Ground (perspectival cut-awareness)
Ontological function:
-
Shows the first-person experience of perspectival positioning.
-
She is not discovering a hidden property but becoming aware of how she is differently positioned inside a single horizon of potential.
-
Aligns with the model: instantiation is a perspectival shift, not a temporal unfolding.
4. The Hearth of Becoming (the metabolic site of actualisation)
Ontological function:
-
Embodies metabolism — the act of construal through interaction.
-
Represents measurement as the metabolic narrowing of a horizon’s pluripotential inclinations into a specific actualisation.
-
Demonstrates that measurement is not revelation but construction: a metabolic cut that reorganises the ecology.
5. The Hearth Whisper (“To touch is to choose…”)
Ontological function:
-
States explicitly that measurement actualises a disposition; it does not retrieve an uninterpreted property from the world.
-
Reinforces the Hallidayan distinction: this is meaning-as-construal, not biological value-making.
6. The Braided Currents (uncommitted inclinations)
Ontological function:
-
Depict interference as interacting inclinations within the horizon.
-
Show that interference is intra-horizon modulation, not wave-based ontology.
-
Emphasise that these patterns exist only before metabolic commitment — afterwards, the ecology restructures.
7. The Braid Breaking and Reforming (ecological dynamism)
Ontological function:
-
Shows that horizons are dynamic relational organisations, not static containers.
-
The ecology shifts as new perspectives are introduced, but without making any metabolic commitment.
8. The Valley’s Closing Lesson (“We are horizons… metabolism… ecologies…”)
Ontological function:
-
States the trilogy of the model: horizon → metabolism → ecology.
-
Connects the myth directly to the ontological distinctions.
-
Reiterates that meaning is relational construal, not intrinsic content.
9. Liora Leaving the Valley (integration of understanding)
Ontological function:
-
Represents the instance transformed by its encounter with the horizon.
-
Demonstrates your ontology’s core idea: meaning is not gained but co-constituted through relational positioning.
-
Her journey is a metaphor for the reader’s perspectival integration.
In summary
| Mythic Element | Relational-Ontological Function |
|---|---|
| Valley-wind | Ecological horizon of shared readiness |
| Cedar tree | Distant locus within the same horizon |
| Liora sensing | Perspectival positioning; instance as cut |
| Hearth | Metabolic actualisation; measurement |
| Hearth whisper | Construal, not revelation |
| Braided currents | Interference as inclination-interaction |
| Braid reforming | Dynamic ecological potential |
| Valley’s lesson | Explicit mapping to horizon/metabolism/ecology |
| Liora leaving | Integrative reorganisation of perspective |
No comments:
Post a Comment