Tracing over-closure, mislocated ontology, and readiness across systems
The Common Pattern
Relational ontology provides a unifying lens: across diverse domains, phenomena emerge through cuts, construals, and horizons, shaped by readiness. Despite appearances, many “problems” arise not from the systems themselves, but from mismanaged relational capacity.
Recurring motifs include:
-
Inclination persists while ability collapses.
-
Horizon exhaustion leads to over-closure.
-
Formal divergence masquerades as ontological mystery.
Semiotic Systems
-
Meaning-making requires sufficient relational room.
-
Over-precision, dogmatic interpretation, or enforced clarity collapses horizons.
-
Nonsense, rigidity, and semantic dead-ends are signs of readiness exhaustion, not deficient symbols.
Physics
-
Singularities (gravitational or wavefunction) arise where the formal system demands continuation beyond available relational room.
-
Divergence appears because inclination (mathematical consistency) persists while ability (horizon for further actualisation) collapses.
-
Infinities are diagnostics of over-closure, not metaphysical absolutes.
Mathematics
-
Internal coherence encodes inclination; assumptions of continuity, differentiability, and persistence presume ability.
-
Infinite or divergent solutions signal horizons of formal potential have been exhausted.
-
The “eternal truths” of mathematics are less metaphysical than relationally constrained.
Cognition and Language
-
Universal Grammar, computational models, or rule-based semantics encode tendencies (inclination) but may fail to preserve relational room.
-
Hard problems of meaning, variation, or acquisition emerge from mislocated ability, where construal cannot keep pace with encoded structure.
-
Linguistic rigidity, interpretive collapse, or semantic drift are horizon failures.
Complex Systems
-
Phase transitions, criticality, and regime shifts mark exhaustion of relational capacity, not emergent inevitability.
-
Degrees of freedom shrink as ability collapses, producing brittleness that can be misread as order or optimality.
-
Adaptive systems maintain readiness to preserve flexibility and avoid catastrophic over-closure.
Mislocated Ontology
Across domains, a structural mistake recurs:
-
Problems are misattributed to the system itself.
-
Divergence, collapse, or rigidity are treated as metaphysical anomalies.
-
In reality, they reflect horizon exhaustion or mismanaged relational capacity — a failure of modelling or construal, not of the phenomenon.
The Payoff
By tracking cuts, construals, and readiness:
-
Phenomena previously considered “mysterious” or “infinite” become intelligible.
-
Common patterns of brittleness, over-closure, and divergence are visible across domains.
-
Relational ontology allows consistent diagnosis and accountable modelling, unifying physics, mathematics, language, cognition, and complex systems.
Forward Gesture
Having shown how relational dynamics manifest across domains, the next post will explore practical modelling strategies: checking readiness, managing horizon exhaustion, and shifting construals responsibly. This is where relational ontology moves from diagnostic insight to applied practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment