Monday, 15 December 2025

Singularities Re‑Construed: Coda: Singularities, Closure, and the Return of Relation

This mini-series on singularities can now be seen for what it is: not a standalone intervention in physics, but a precise instantiation of a broader relational diagnosis that has already appeared elsewhere on this blog.

Across domains, the pattern is the same.


Mathematics: Formal Closure Mistaken for Ontology

In the mathematics series, we traced how formal necessity acquires metaphysical authority. Internal coherence is quietly reinterpreted as ontological inevitability. Models forget the cuts that made them possible.

Singularities are one of the clearest late-stage symptoms of this mistake. They arise when formal inclination is allowed to continue after the relational conditions that sustained it—readiness—have collapsed. Infinity appears not because reality is boundless, but because closure has gone unacknowledged.


Dualism: Separation as Method Hardened into Being

In the dualism series, the same structure appeared under a different guise. Epistemic separation—useful as a methodological cut—was mistaken for an ontological division of the world. Mind and world were exiled from one another, and relation itself was left untheorised.

The resulting “hard problems” are not discoveries about consciousness or meaning. They are debts incurred by over-separation: by treating the products of a cut as substances rather than perspectives.

Singularities function analogously. They are what appear when relation is excluded and models are allowed to speak as if they were self-grounding.


A Single Diagnosis, Repeated

What unites these cases—mathematics, dualism, and singularities—is not error but over-closure.

  • Formal systems forget the readiness conditions that make them applicable.

  • Conceptual separations forget the relational cuts that produced them.

  • Models continue to project inclination where ability no longer obtains.

The result is metaphysical drama where there should have been reflexive restraint.


The Relational Alternative

Relational ontology offers a quiet but decisive correction.

It does not reject mathematics, science, or abstraction. It refuses only the forgetting of relation.

Cuts are real—but they are cuts through potential, not revelations of ultimate being.
Readiness is indispensable—but it is a condition of construal, not a feature of the universe.
Objectivity is preserved—but only as accountable construal within an explicit horizon.


Closing Orientation

Seen this way, singularities are not special.

They are simply the point at which a familiar mistake becomes impossible to ignore.

Where mathematics runs out of room, where dualism runs out of coherence, and where physics runs out of traction, the same lesson appears:

relation was doing the work all along.

Remembering that does not weaken science.

It returns science to itself.

No comments:

Post a Comment