Snark as Parody of Empiricism — Hunting What Cannot Be Seen

“They hunted it with a map and a rule-book and a firm belief that sight equals truth.”

The Snark does not appear. The Baker vanishes. The Bellman insists.

Observation fails. Systematic collection fails. Yet the hunt continues — and therein lies the absurd genius of Carroll’s critique.

---

1. Clinical: Observation as Relational Cut

• Empiricism assumes objects exist independently of the observer.

• Carroll shows that in the field of relational density:

  • The Snark is unobservable as a fixed entity.

  • Every observation is partial, perspectival, and system-dependent.

  • Each “cut” the crew makes — noting the Snark, plotting a course, naming it — does not yield objectivity, only relational order.

The map, the charts, the logs are vectors of expectation, not proofs of existence. Empirical rigor cannot capture relational potential in its entirety.

• Implication: Observation is not neutral; it co-produces the field it attempts to measure. The Snark is less a creature than a mirror of the hunter’s methods.

---

2. Satirical Undercurrent: Victorian Logic and Its Limits

• Victorian empiricism demanded measurement, classification, and verification.

• Carroll mocks this logic with precision:

  • The more the crew seeks certainty, the more absurd the results.

  • The Boojum looms as empirical catastrophe — the system cannot reconcile observation with generative potential.

  • Every “scientific” act (measuring, recording, mapping) only highlights the gap between method and reality.

Carroll’s satire is structural: the absurdity emerges not from whimsy alone, but from the tension between method and impossible object.

---

3. Mischievous Layer: Reader as Empirical Participant

• Readers are invited to play the empiricist:

  • Observe, name, infer.

  • Try to stabilise the Snark as object.

  • Fail, spectacularly.

• Each attempt to pin the Snark mirrors the crew’s failures — you are implicated in the parody.

• Carroll transforms the reader from passive witness to co-experimenter in absurdity, enacting the limits of naive empiricism.

Observation is performative. To look is to participate. To hope for certainty is to flirt with Boojum thresholds.

---

4. Implications for Relational Ontology

• Objects are not primary: The Snark exists relationally, not empirically.

• Cuts are constructive, not revelatory: Observation generates construals; it does not guarantee truth.

• Density tests method: Empirical procedures must navigate relational density, or risk catastrophic failure.

• Reader participation completes the system: Seeing and believing are entwined; the field persists only as long as observers engage, even in error.

---

5. Closing Haemostasis

• The parody of empiricism teaches that systemic potential cannot be fully reduced to observation.

• The hunt becomes a performance of method under relational uncertainty.

• Carroll’s insight is timeless: knowledge is not merely seen; it is enacted, negotiated, and maintained across a network of observers and relational cuts.

Look, name, chart, theorise. And yet — the Snark remains elusive, generative, and profoundly instructive.