Hunting the Snark: Ontology at the Edge of Meaning: 4 Boojum: Catastrophic Density

“For the Snark was a Boojum, you see.”

And with that line, the Baker vanishes.

Not merely a narrative flourish. Not merely whimsy.

A relational collapse occurs.

The Boojum is density unabsorbed by its construal system. Potential, when actualised without structural support, becomes catastrophic.

---

1. Clinical: When Potential Exceeds System

• The crew’s distributed construal can sustain relational density only up to a threshold.

• The Snark as pure potential requires careful cuts; too much perspectival stress triggers collapse.

• The Boojum is a systemic failure: the actualisation of potential overwhelms the network of construal.

The Baker does not vanish because of the Snark’s malice. He vanishes because the system’s integrity cannot absorb the instantiation.

• Significance: Catastrophe is intrinsic to the relational structure, not accidental.

• Pattern: Density → cut → unabsorbed actualisation → collapse.

---

2. Satirical Undercurrent: Victorian Anxiety Meets Ontology

Victorian readers recoiled at nonsense.

They were right — and wrong.

• Right, because a construal system, once overstressed, produces chaos.

• Wrong, because Carroll deliberately models structural instability as a feature, not a bug.

• The absurdity is instructive: the poem enacts the limits of representational thinking, mocking our desire for stable objects and heroic outcomes.

“Vanishing” is not tragedy. It is ontological pedagogy.

---

3. Mischievous Layer: Reader Implication

Every reader is a node in the network:

• Your attention, your construals, your imaginative projections contribute to the system.

• Overcommitment to stability or certainty risks your own interpretive “vanishing.”

• Carroll’s joke: you are already in danger of being a Boojum, even as you read clinically.

Density is contagious. Actualisation is performative. The Snark is everywhere you look — and nowhere you can contain.

---

4. Catastrophe as Generative Principle

Here, relational ontology turns a paradoxical twist:

• Catastrophe is not failure, but informational signal:

  • It reveals system limits.

  • It maps thresholds of absorption.

  • It teaches how density generates novelty.

• Boojum logic parallels the most radical of our previous posts:

  • Blank map → potential

  • Name → relational cut

  • Crew → distributed network

  • Boojum → limit case of generative density

• In other words, the Snark-as-Boojum is the system reflecting back its own maximal constraint.

---

5. Concluding Haemostasis: Surviving the Cut

The Baker’s vanishing is horrifying. And instructive.

• Generative systems require careful management of density.

• The crew must balance cut and absorption.

• The reader must balance curiosity and suspension: too eager to stabilise, and you risk interpretive collapse.

In relational terms, the Boojum is not a creature. It is a warning: density, uncontained, is annihilatory.

In literary terms, it is the apex of Carrollian mischief.

And in experiential terms, it is the thrill of being implicated in a system larger than oneself.