Mini-Series Overview: From c as Constraint to Reason-Free Physics

This mini-series traces a careful arc from physics-facing structural clarity to relational-ontological understanding, culminating in a release from metaphysical illusions of governance and ultimate reason.

1. c as Constraint: How One Constant Holds Spacetime, Mass, and Energy Together

• Introduces c as an invariant linking mass, energy, and spacetime.

• Clarifies that invariance does not imply substance or ontological depth.

• Prepares the reader to question metaphysical readings of physical constants.

2. Invariant Without Substance: c Revisited Through Relational Ontology

• Relocates invariants within a relational-ontological frame.

• Shows that c is a condition of coherent description across perspectives.

• Distinguishes the structured potential (system) from actualised events (phenomena).

3. Constraint, Not Command: Why Physical Laws Do Not Govern the World

• Contrasts invariants-as-constraints with the law-as-command metaphor.

• Argues that laws articulate stable relational structures rather than issue mandates.

• Positions necessity as internal to systems rather than externally enforced.

4. Explanation Without Causation, Necessity Without Governance

• Releases explanation from causation and necessity from governance.

• Shows that physics operates architecturally: articulating coherence conditions rather than producing events.

• Demonstrates that relational articulation provides both explanation and necessity without metaphysical overreach.

5. Why the Universe Doesn't Need Reasons

• Addresses the human impulse for ultimate explanation.

• Reframes reasons as features of construals, not properties of the universe.

• Concludes that the universe is intelligible in relation, not because it is compelled.

---

Series Takeaway

Across these five posts, readers are guided from:

• Physics-facing rigour → structural invariance

• Ontology-facing clarity → relational constraints

• Metaphysical unlearning → release from governance and ultimate why

The series demonstrates how relational ontology reframes core concepts in physics without altering their predictive or operational content, offering a disciplined, reason-free perspective that aligns with both experimental practice and theoretical coherence.