Friday, 23 January 2026

After the Reluctant Universe: Dialogue I — On Space (and Why It Isn’t a Place)

Characters:

Professor Quillibrace
Mr Blottisham
Miss Elowen Stray


Blottisham:
I assume we are now to discuss space itself. Vast, empty, waiting patiently for things to happen inside it.

Quillibrace:
That assumption is precisely what we are not going to do.

Elowen Stray:
So… space isn’t a container?

Quillibrace:
No.

Blottisham:
A fabric, then? Stretched, curved, possibly torn?

Quillibrace:
Also no.

Blottisham:
Then I’m already confused. Where are things, if not in space?

Quillibrace:
They are not in space. They are spatially related.

Elowen Stray:
That sounds like more than a grammatical correction.

Quillibrace:
It is an ontological one.

Blottisham:
But surely space must exist first, so relations can occur within it?

Quillibrace:
That is the mistake. Relations are not placed into space; space is abstracted from relations.

Elowen Stray:
So space isn’t something we discover, but something we derive?

Quillibrace:
Exactly. A system of constraints that stabilises certain relational regularities.

Blottisham:
Constraints? Space feels rather… expansive for that.

Quillibrace:
Expansiveness is a metaphor born of habit. What matters is that spatiality allows certain distinctions—near and far, adjacent and separated—to be made coherently.

Elowen Stray:
So space is a way of keeping relations intelligible?

Quillibrace:
A very good way of putting it.

Blottisham:
But physics measures space. Rulers, coordinates, metrics—

Quillibrace:
—measurements presuppose the construal. They do not establish its ontological priority.

Blottisham:
Then when we speak of space “existing”, what are we really saying?

Quillibrace:
That a particular relational scheme has been stabilised well enough to be treated as background.

Elowen Stray:
And when that scheme fails?

Quillibrace:
We call it exotic. Or extreme. Or paradoxical.

Blottisham:
You mean black holes? Cosmology? The edges of the universe?

Quillibrace:
I mean any situation where we insist on treating space as a thing rather than a condition.

Elowen Stray:
So space isn’t where things are…

Quillibrace:
…it is how certain relations hold together.

Blottisham:
I find this deeply unsettling. I rather liked knowing where I was.

Quillibrace:
You still do. Nothing practical has changed.

Blottisham:
Then why make such a fuss?

Quillibrace:
Because when we forget this distinction, we begin asking nonsensical questions.

Elowen Stray:
Such as?

Quillibrace:
What space is made of.
Where space ends.
What existed before space.

Blottisham:
Those are very fine questions!

Quillibrace:
They are very fine category errors.

Elowen Stray:
So when space “curves”…

Quillibrace:
…it is not a thing bending, but a relational constraint changing.

Blottisham:
And when space “expands”…

Quillibrace:
…the relations re-scale. Nothing moves into anything else.

Elowen Stray:
Then the universe isn’t sitting in space at all.

Quillibrace:
No. Space is one of the ways the universe is made intelligible—until it isn’t.

Blottisham:
I feel as though the floor has vanished beneath me.

Quillibrace:
On the contrary. You have simply noticed that the floor was never a substance.

Elowen Stray:
And once we see that…

Quillibrace:
…many mysteries lose their theatrical glow.

Blottisham:
I dislike this trend.

Quillibrace:
You will like it even less when we discuss time.

(A pause. Elowen smiles, not entirely certain she understands, but quite certain something important has shifted.)

No comments:

Post a Comment