We began with a question that seemed simple:
How do we know the world?
But the question has changed along the way.
Before knowledge, there was difference.
Difference became mattering.
Mattering became distinction.
Distinctions became organised.
The world became articulate.
Systems emerged that could make instances intelligible.
Instances, in turn, could transform the systems through which they were understood.
And meaning became available for further meaning.
At no point did a knower have to step outside the world and look back at it.
Knowing emerged within the world.
This does not mean that the world literally thinks.
It means something quieter.
The world contains processes through which differences can become consequential, distinctions can persist, patterns can be organised, and meanings can become available for further articulation.
Life makes a world matter.
Social organisation makes differences consequential in new ways.
Language makes experience available as an organised potential for meaning.
Knowledge is one of the forms this continuing articulation can take.
Perhaps, then, the deepest mistake was to imagine the knower and the known as two things standing on opposite sides of a divide.
The world is not first there, fully articulated, and then represented by a knower.
Nor is it invented by the systems through which it becomes intelligible.
It is encountered, constrained, distinguished, organised and continually rearticulated.
The world pushes back.
The system changes.
New distinctions become possible.
And the world becomes different—not because reality itself has been manufactured, but because more of what can matter has become available to meaning.
Perhaps this is what it means for the world to know.
Not that the universe possesses a mind.
Not that everything is conscious.
But that, within the history of the world, there have emerged processes through which the world can become articulate to itself.
A living system distinguishes.
A social system organises.
A semiotic system means.
And wherever meaning can become available for further meaning, the world has acquired another way of becoming intelligible.
Knowing, then, may not be a window through which we look out upon the world.
It may be one of the ways the world continues to become a world.
And perhaps that was the question we were really asking all along:
What kind of world can become capable of knowing?
The answer may be:
a world in which differences can matter, distinctions can persist, meanings can grow—and nothing that knows ever stands completely outside what it knows.
No comments:
Post a Comment