A difference can matter and then disappear.
A sudden change in temperature may alter an organism's activity, after which conditions return to normal.
But sometimes something remains.
The system has been changed by what happened.
This is the beginning of memory.
Not memory as recollection.
Memory as the persistence of a difference produced by a previous difference.
A plant exposed to particular conditions can alter the way it subsequently grows. An immune system can respond differently after an earlier encounter. A nervous system can change its organisation through experience.
In each case, the past has become part of the present.
Something that happened before has not simply ceased to exist.
It has left a trace in the organisation of the system.
This gives memory a much broader history than remembering.
A scar is a memory of injury.
A path worn through grass is a memory of repeated movement.
A tree's shape can record its history of wind and light.
The structure of a brain can retain traces of experience.
These are very different phenomena, but they share a basic relational pattern:
something happens → the system changes → the change persists → the changed system encounters the world differently.
Memory therefore changes significance.
Before the change, a particular difference may have had one consequence.
After the change, it can have another.
The organism has acquired a history.
This is crucial because an organism with history does not encounter the present as an entirely new event.
Its current possibilities are partly shaped by what has happened before.
A nutrient encountered today may alter a cell differently because of its previous metabolic state.
A familiar environment may elicit a different response from an animal than an unfamiliar one.
A human being can recognise a face because the present encounter activates traces left by earlier encounters.
The complexity varies enormously.
The underlying principle does not.
The past has become a condition of present possibility.
This gives memory a special relationship to significance.
A difference matters not only because of what it does now.
Its significance can depend upon what the system has previously undergone.
Experience therefore changes the meaning of future differences without requiring meaning in the symbolic sense.
A repeated stimulus can become less consequential.
A previously harmless stimulus can become associated with danger.
A new resource can become usable once the organism has acquired the capacity to exploit it.
The system has been reorganised by history.
This is one reason learning is such an important development in natural history.
Learning does not merely add information to an organism.
It changes the organisation through which subsequent differences are encountered.
The organism's world has changed because the organism itself has changed.
And this produces a striking form of circularity.
The organism encounters the world.
The encounter changes the organism.
The changed organism encounters the world differently.
The world has not necessarily changed.
But the relation between organism and world has.
Memory therefore creates a second-order history.
The system does not merely have a history of events.
It has a history of being changed by events.
That distinction becomes increasingly important as living systems become more complex.
A bacterium can retain molecular consequences of previous conditions.
A plant can retain physiological traces of earlier environments.
An animal can retain learned patterns of behaviour.
A human can retain experiences as explicit memories and use them to imagine possible futures.
At the far end of this trajectory, memory can become representation.
But representation is not where memory begins.
Memory begins whenever the past alters the organisation through which the future is encountered.
This also deepens our account of significance.
A difference is significant because it makes a difference to an organised system.
But once that system has memory, the significance of a difference can be transformed by its history.
The same event can matter differently because it has happened before.
Significance is no longer simply relational.
It is historical.
And once significance becomes historical, possibility becomes historical too.
The organism does not encounter a fixed menu of possible futures.
Its previous encounters continually alter the possibilities it can recognise, exploit, avoid or generate.
The past therefore enters the future without having to remain present as a representation.
It survives as organisation.
Perhaps this is one of the deepest meanings of memory:
the past continues to matter because it has changed what the system can become.
A difference has occurred.
It has left a trace.
And that trace has changed the significance of the next difference.
The world has acquired history.
No comments:
Post a Comment