Genesis begins with creation, but its most striking feature is not simply what is created. It is how creation is construed.
The natural way to represent the creation of a world is through material processes: something makes something else, something comes into existence, something changes.
Genesis could have done this.
Instead, its creation repeatedly takes the form of speech:
God said, “Let there be light”: and there was light.
The material order is presented as the projection of a verbal process. God says; what is said becomes actual.
This is more than a stylistic feature of the narrative. It gives creation a particular symbolic structure.
The world is represented as emerging from saying.
The distinction matters because saying is not itself a material process. It is a semiotic process. Something is first construed as meaning and expressed as wording; the material world then appears as the outcome of that projection.
Genesis therefore presents the order of the world as if it were the content of a linguistic act.
We need not suppose that its authors intended a theory of language, or that they understood cognition in anything like modern linguistic terms. The question is what the text makes possible for us to construe. Its cultural history is evidence of what has survived and continued to generate meaning, not evidence of what its authors consciously knew.
Read in this way, the creation narrative can symbolise something more fundamental than the origin of physical things.
It can symbolise the emergence of a linguistically construed world.
The world we experience is not simply an inventory of things. It is differentiated, related, ordered, named, evaluated and made significant. Language makes such construal possible.
Genesis gives this process a mythic form by placing the Sayer at the beginning.
God does not first construct the world and then describe it.
The world is said into being.
And this makes the creation story unexpectedly close to a theory of human cognition.
Halliday's claim is that language created the specifically human mode of cognition by establishing a relation between meaning and wording. Genesis can be read, symbolically, as representing the corresponding transformation in another direction: the world itself is presented as the projection of saying.
The myth does not tell us that language describes a world.
It gives us a world that is said.
Perhaps that is why its creation narrative begins not with a thing, but with a voice.
And perhaps the deeper question is not simply how the world came to exist, but:
How does experience become a world that can be said?
No comments:
Post a Comment