Meaning allows differences to become available for shared construal.
But concepts do something more.
They organise distinctions.
And when distinctions become organised, some differences begin to matter in new ways.
Consider a forest.
Physically, it contains trees, soil, water, organisms, light and countless differences among them.
But there is no single way of construing what those differences amount to.
The forest can become timber.
Habitat.
Wilderness.
Property.
Carbon store.
Sacred ground.
Recreation.
Each construal makes some differences more consequential than others.
If the forest is timber, the size and quality of trees may matter.
If it is habitat, the presence of particular species may matter.
If it is property, boundaries and ownership may matter.
If it is wilderness, human disturbance may matter.
The physical forest has not changed simply because we have changed the concept through which we construe it.
But the landscape of human action has.
This is the peculiar power of concepts.
They do not merely add information to experience.
They organise what counts as relevant.
A distinction that was previously invisible can become decisive.
A difference that previously passed unnoticed can become evidence.
A feature that once seemed incidental can become a reason for action.
The concept changes the field in which differences can make a difference.
This is why conceptual change can be consequential without being magical.
Suppose we begin to think of a stretch of river as an ecosystem rather than merely as water.
Nothing has been added to the river.
But new relations become visible.
Fish populations matter.
Nutrient cycles matter.
Upstream activity matters.
Seasonal variation matters.
The river can now be understood as part of a larger organisation.
The concept has not created these relations.
It has made them available within a particular way of construing the world.
And once they become available, action can change.
This is where concepts begin to acquire histories of their own.
A concept can be built into a practice.
A practice can be built into an institution.
An institution can alter the environment.
The altered environment can then make different things matter.
The process is circular.
Concepts change what we attend to.
What we attend to changes what we do.
What we do changes the conditions under which future differences occur.
Those differences then become available for further conceptualisation.
The landscape of mattering can therefore be transformed without the underlying world becoming a different world in every respect.
A species can become endangered because its habitat has changed.
But the concept endangered species can also change what counts as a relevant difference.
A population that might once have been merely declining can now become an object of measurement, concern, regulation and protection.
The concept does not cause the animal's biology.
It changes the social consequences of knowing about it.
This distinction matters.
Concepts do not manufacture physical significance out of nothing.
They reorganise the relations through which differences become consequential for human practices.
A medical category can change how symptoms are interpreted.
A legal category can change what an action permits or prohibits.
An economic category can change what counts as a resource.
A scientific category can change what counts as an observation.
The world does not become whatever the concept says it is.
But the concept can change which differences we build our actions around.
This is why conceptual systems can become powerful.
They provide pathways through which some differences travel further than others.
A difference can become a measurement.
A measurement can become a statistic.
A statistic can become a policy.
A policy can become an institution.
An institution can change the lives of people who never encountered the original measurement.
The difference has travelled.
And by the time it reaches them, it may no longer resemble the difference from which the process began.
This is perhaps one of the strangest properties of meaning.
A distinction can acquire consequences far beyond the circumstances in which it was first made.
And because concepts can be inherited, these consequences can persist.
We may continue to organise the world according to distinctions whose origins we have forgotten.
The conceptual landscape can therefore become part of the environment.
It can constrain.
It can afford.
It can make some possibilities visible and others difficult to see.
It can determine what counts as a problem before anyone has begun looking for a solution.
But this does not make concepts omnipotent.
They remain constrained by the world.
A concept cannot make a forest grow faster.
It cannot make a species exist.
It cannot make a river flow uphill.
What it can do is alter the human pathways through which physical differences become consequential.
And this brings us back to the central question.
When does a difference make a difference?
Sometimes because it changes a physical process.
Sometimes because it constrains a possibility.
Sometimes because it matters to a living system.
Sometimes because an organism becomes sensitive to it.
Sometimes because it indicates something else.
Sometimes because it stands for something.
And sometimes because a concept has taught a community that the difference matters.
The progression is not a ladder from primitive to advanced.
These forms coexist.
A physical difference can remain a physical difference while simultaneously becoming a matter of life, a perceptual distinction, an indication, a sign and a conceptual category.
The same difference can participate in several worlds at once.
Perhaps this is why the world can seem so full of meaning.
It is not that everything inherently means something.
It is that layers of organisation have accumulated around differences.
Physical systems.
Living systems.
Perceptual systems.
Semiotic systems.
Conceptual systems.
Each can make differences consequential in its own way.
And each can alter the conditions under which further differences become consequential.
We began with the simple observation that nothing happens without difference.
We can now see that the really interesting question was never simply whether differences exist.
It was how differences acquire trajectories.
Some disappear.
Some constrain.
Some matter.
Some indicate.
Some signify.
Some become concepts.
And some concepts eventually change what a whole community takes to matter.
That leaves one final question.
If the world is continually generating differences, and organised beings are continually turning some of them into consequences, meanings and concepts, then perhaps the deepest question is not:
What differences exist?
but:
What happens to differences once they begin to matter?
No comments:
Post a Comment