Freedom as Structured Availability: 5 Freedom and Causation Unified

By now, the reader has seen two radical inversions:

1. Causation is relational, not force-based: dependencies, costs, and structured patterns explain sequences without pushes or metaphysical laws.

2. Freedom is structured availability: choice and responsibility emerge from the landscape of feasible paths, not from libertarian escape or hidden agents.

It is time to show that these two inversions are not separate phenomena, but two faces of the same relational architecture.

---

The Common Principle: Structured Re-Cutting

Both causation and freedom arise from the same underlying mechanism:

• Events actualise along paths permitted by relational constraints.

• Inertia, persistence, and gradiented availability shape patterns over time.

• Apparent directionality, causal chains, and choice all emerge from paths of minimal relational cost.

In short:

• Inertia: flat availability → persistence

• Gravity: gradiented availability → directed change

• Choice/Freedom: structured availability → selective actualisation

All are manifestations of constraint architecture, differing only in topology and context.

---

Example: A Falling Apple

• Gravity series: the apple moves along a path of minimal cost dictated by mass distribution.

• Freedom series: if the apple is picked up and placed elsewhere, choice is a local re-cut within a feasible network of possibilities.

• Both sequences — apparent falling or apparent choice — are actualisations in the relational landscape, not effects of hidden pushes.

---

Example: Social Decision-Making

• Causation: one member’s input modulates feasibility for others; the network evolves accordingly.

• Freedom: another member exercises choice within the same constraint architecture, actualizing one of several minimally costly paths.

• Both are intelligible as structured re-cutting in a shared relational network.

---

Why the Unification Matters

1. It eliminates dualism: causation and freedom are not separate realms, nor do they require distinct metaphysical machinery.

2. It clarifies apparent agency: choice is emergent, not supernatural, and causal sequences are emergent, not push-driven.

3. It prepares for extensions: once freedom and causation are unified, concepts like social coordination, ethics, and large-scale system dynamics can be explored without contradiction.

---

Visual Summary

Relational Network
 ├─> Inertia (persistence)
 ├─> Gravity (gradiented change)
  └─> Freedom (structured actualisation)

All actualisations occur where relational constraints permit feasible paths. The same architecture explains apparent causation and choice.