Sunday, 25 January 2026

Freedom as Structured Availability: 4 Responsibility Without Agents

Having seen that choice is local re-cutting within a relational network, a natural question arises: what becomes of responsibility and accountability if there are no metaphysical agents or hidden powers? Classical intuitions suggest that responsibility requires a free, autonomous actor. Relational ontology shows that this is not the case.


Responsibility as Relational Modulation

In a structured network:

  • Some nodes or events significantly alter the landscape of feasible paths.

  • These nodes are responsible in the sense that their actualisation materially affects subsequent re-cuttings.

  • Responsibility is thus relational and contextual, not a property of a metaphysical agent.

Example: A manager’s decision in a team meeting:

  • The decision shifts which options are feasible for others.

  • Responsibility is attributed because the decision modulates the cost landscape, not because the manager wields a hidden causal power.

  • Accountability follows from this modulation, not from abstract autonomy.


Ethics Without Agents

Relational responsibility reframes ethics:

  1. Focus on patterns, not souls: Outcomes matter because they structure future possibilities, not because they reflect a “free will.”

  2. Traceable influence: Responsibility is assigned to nodes whose actualisation significantly alters relational availability.

  3. Distributed accountability: In complex systems, multiple nodes can share responsibility; no single agent is metaphysically privileged.


Example: Social Coordination

Consider a collaborative project:

  • Team members’ actions interact in a web of constraints.

  • Each contribution modulates feasible paths for others.

  • Responsibility emerges where interventions have significant relational consequences.

  • Apparent agency and accountability are simply the patterned structure of influence.


Key Takeaways

  • Responsibility is emergent, not metaphysical.

  • Agency is narrative, but accountability can be real and relationally grounded.

  • Ethics can be fully integrated with relational ontology without smuggling in libertarian freedom or hidden agents.

No comments:

Post a Comment