When most people think of freedom, they imagine a state in which constraints vanish: the self acts independently, unbounded by circumstances or rules. This classical, libertarian intuition sees freedom as the absence of constraint, as if choice could exist in a vacuum.
Relational ontology immediately exposes this as a conceptual illusion. Once we understand that all events unfold within networks of constraints and dependencies, the idea of freedom as “constraint-free” action becomes incoherent. Every choice, every action, every apparent deviation occurs because of, not despite, the relational architecture. There is no metaphysical void in which a free agent hovers — there is only structured possibility.
Freedom Is Not Absence of Constraint
Consider a musician improvising a melody:
-
The notes chosen are not “uncaused.”
-
Each note is feasible given the previous notes, the instrument, the musician’s technique, and the music theory conventions being followed.
-
Constraints are not enemies of freedom; they are the architecture that makes choice intelligible.
Remove the constraints, and there is no coherent music — only noise. Freedom, in this sense, emerges from the relational structure itself, not from escaping it.
The Classical Misstep
Libertarian freedom rests on two hidden assumptions:
-
That agents can act independently of context
-
That constraints reduce freedom, rather than shaping it
Both are false in a relational reading. Constraints do not limit freedom; they define the landscape in which freedom can occur. Choice is always a local actualisation of feasible paths; the richer the landscape of structured availability, the more expansive the freedom.
Structured Possibility
We can begin to formalise this idea:
-
Every agent, system, or event exists within a network of compatibilities and constraints.
-
A “free” action is simply the actualisation of a path through this network where alternatives exist and constraints permit divergence.
-
Freedom is structured availability, not absence.
In short:
You are never outside constraints. You are free to the extent that your constraints afford multiple minimally costly paths.
Why This Matters
-
It dismantles the intuitive but incoherent idea of metaphysical escape.
-
It prepares the ground to see choice, decision, and agency as emergent from relational architecture.
-
It connects directly to the previous series on causation, showing that freedom and causation are two sides of the same structural principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment