The concept of possibility occupies a curious position in contemporary thought.
We often treat possibilities as if they simply exist.
An organism possesses possible behaviours.
A system possesses possible states.
A collective possesses possible futures.
Possibility appears as a background condition against which actual events occur.
Yet this way of thinking conceals an important fact.
Possibilities are rarely, if ever, equally available.
Some possibilities are easy to actualise.
Others are difficult.
Some are encouraged.
Others are inhibited.
Some are effectively impossible despite remaining conceivable.
The mere existence of possibilities therefore tells us remarkably little.
What matters is how possibilities are organised.
Possibility exceeds actuality
Any actual event is only one among many possible events.
An animal may move left or right.
A flock may disperse or remain together.
A colony may allocate resources in different ways.
At every moment, possibilities exceed actualisations.
This observation is so familiar that its significance is often overlooked.
Actuality is always selective.
To actualise one possibility is simultaneously not to actualise others.
Every event therefore presupposes a field of unrealised alternatives.
The question is not whether possibilities exist.
The question is why some possibilities become actual while others do not.
Possibility is structured
A common assumption is that possibilities exist as a neutral collection from which actual events are selected.
Yet organised systems rarely behave in this way.
Consider a simple organism.
At any given moment, it may possess many possible actions.
It may move.
Remain still.
Approach.
Withdraw.
Investigate.
Avoid.
These possibilities do not stand in a relation of equality.
Some are more readily actualised than others.
Some are favoured under particular conditions.
Others are suppressed.
The field of possibilities already possesses structure before any behaviour occurs.
Possibility is therefore not merely a collection.
It is an organised field.
Constraint as organisation
The concept of constraint is often understood negatively.
To constrain something appears to be to reduce it.
To remove options.
To impose limitations.
Yet organised systems suggest a different perspective.
Constraint does not merely eliminate possibilities.
It differentiates them.
It makes some possibilities more available than others.
Without constraint, every possibility would possess equal status.
The result would not be organisation but indifference.
Constraint is therefore not the opposite of possibility.
It is one of the conditions under which possibility acquires structure.
Organised possibility
This observation can be stated more generally.
The behaviour of organised systems cannot be understood simply by listing what is possible.
What matters is the organisation of possibility itself.
Different systems organise possibilities differently.
Some possibilities become highly accessible.
Others become unlikely.
Still others become effectively unavailable.
The structure of a system therefore resides not only in what it does, but in how it organises what it could do.
Possibility becomes a property of organisation rather than a mere catalogue of alternatives.
From possibilities to systems
This shift in perspective has important consequences.
It suggests that systems may be distinguished not only by their actual behaviour but by the way they structure possibility.
Two systems may display similar behaviours while organising possibilities very differently.
Conversely, systems that appear superficially different may share similar patterns of constraint.
The organisation of possibility therefore provides a deeper level of description than behaviour alone.
To understand a system is not simply to observe what happens.
It is to understand how possibilities are structured before they happen.
A new starting point
Much of modern thought begins with actual events.
Actions.
States.
Behaviours.
Decisions.
The perspective developed here begins elsewhere.
It begins with possibility.
Not possibility as an abstract logical category, but possibility as something organised.
Possibilities are not simply present.
They are structured.
Differentiated.
Constrained.
Directed.
The question therefore becomes:
How are possibilities organised?
This question will guide the remainder of the series.
For before we can understand social systems, collective organisation, or the emergence of meaning, we must first understand the more general phenomenon from which they arise:
the organisation of possibility itself.
Summary
Possibilities always exceed actualities.
Yet possibilities are not merely collections of alternatives.
They are structured fields organised through constraint.
Constraint does not simply eliminate possibilities.
It differentiates them, making some more available than others.
To understand an organised system therefore requires more than observing its behaviour.
It requires understanding how the system structures possibility itself.
The next step is to ask how such organisation occurs.
What principle differentiates possibilities within an organised system?
To answer this question, we must turn to the concept of value.
No comments:
Post a Comment