St Anselm’s College: Senior Common Room Discussion
By now, the atmosphere in the Senior Common Room has changed in a way none of them are willing to name.
Blottisham is no longer annotating the text. He is simply tapping it occasionally, as though checking whether it still responds to normal intellectual pressure.
Stray has adopted a posture of careful stillness, as if movement might introduce assumptions.
Quillibrace opens the next section.
“Attention as Participation”
Blottisham exhales with relief.
“Ah. Good. Attention. Finally something familiar. So we have a viewer now.”
Quillibrace does not respond immediately.
Stray looks up slowly.
“It does not yet say ‘viewer’.”
Blottisham waves a hand.
“Well, attention implies a viewer. That’s just standard cognitive architecture.”
Quillibrace turns the page.
“It explicitly warns against that assumption.”
Blottisham pauses.
“…Of a viewer?”
Quillibrace:
“Of a subject who attends.”
A silence.
Blottisham leans forward again.
“So what is attending then, if not a subject doing it?”
Stray speaks carefully.
“It says attention is not an act.”
Blottisham blinks.
“…Then what is it?”
Quillibrace reads:
“the participation of differentiation in its own stabilisation”
Blottisham sits back immediately.
“That’s just words arranged to avoid saying someone is looking at something.”
Stray shakes her head.
“It seems to be saying there is no separation available yet between looking and what is looked at.”
Blottisham points at the page.
“That’s just… merged looking.”
Quillibrace looks up.
“No.”
Blottisham tries again.
“Distributed looking?”
“No.”
“Field-based looking?”
Quillibrace pauses.
“That is precisely the kind of metaphor it is refusing.”
Blottisham exhales.
“Right. So no looking. But somehow still attention.”
Stray adds softly:
“Attention as maintenance of distinction.”
Blottisham frowns.
“That sounds like attention doing work without being a thing.”
Quillibrace nods.
“Yes.”
Blottisham stares.
“…That is not how attention works.”
Quillibrace replies evenly.
“It is how it is being reconstructed here.”
Blottisham leans forward.
“So attention is… what keeps differences from disappearing?”
Stray nods.
“In a sense.”
Blottisham brightens.
“Right. So attention is a stabilising force.”
Quillibrace looks up immediately.
“No.”
Blottisham freezes.
“…Not a force?”
Stray answers:
“Force implies separation between agent and effect.”
Blottisham gestures vaguely.
“Okay, so not a force. A process.”
Quillibrace:
“No.”
Blottisham sighs.
“Right. So not force, not process, not act…”
He pauses.
“…Is it anything?”
A brief silence.
Stray answers quietly.
“It is what happens when differentiation does not collapse uniformly.”
Blottisham sits back.
“That is not helpful.”
Quillibrace closes the page slightly.
“It is deliberately not reified.”
Blottisham looks at him.
“That sounds like a personal attack on my ability to understand things.”
Quillibrace replies without hesitation.
“It is not personal.”
Stray adds, almost gently:
“It is structural.”
Blottisham looks between them.
“So we don’t have a viewer, we don’t have attention as an act, and we don’t have separation between seeing and seen.”
Quillibrace:
“Correct.”
Blottisham pauses.
“So what’s doing the seeing?”
A silence that lasts slightly too long.
Stray answers first.
“That may be the wrong question.”
Blottisham leans back.
“It feels like the only remaining question.”
Quillibrace turns the page.
“It assumes what has not yet been permitted.”
Blottisham groans.
“So we are not allowed a seer.”
Quillibrace:
“No.”
Blottisham:
“Or a seen.”
Quillibrace:
“No.”
Blottisham:
“Or seeing.”
Quillibrace:
“No.”
Blottisham stares at him.
“…Then what are we doing?”
Stray replies softly:
“Trying to understand what must be the case for anything to be distinguishable at all.”
Blottisham leans back fully now.
“I miss objects.”
Quillibrace, without looking up:
“That sentiment is also data.”
Blottisham mutters:
“I hate this paper.”
Stray, almost imperceptibly:
“It is not yet a paper.”
Quillibrace turns the page.
“And we are not yet finished with attention.”
Blottisham closes his eyes briefly.
“…Of course we’re not.”
No comments:
Post a Comment