Nonsense as a Technology of Possibility: II Structured Potential Without Capture: Activation Without Exhaustion

If Post I reframed nonsense from genre to operation, we now examine its first core function:

Nonsense activates structured potential without exhausting it.

This is the central technical claim.

To understand it, we must distinguish between activation and capture.

---

1. Structured Potential

Language is not a heap of words.

It is a system — a structured field of possible relations.

Every utterance is a selection within that field.

Every reading is a local actualisation of potential.

The system exceeds any instance.

This excess is not accidental.

It is the condition of meaning itself.

---

2. The Habit of Capture

Many discourses treat activation as if it must culminate in closure.

• Scientific discourse seeks determinate reference.

• Administrative discourse seeks operational clarity.

• Doctrinal discourse seeks final articulation.

In each case, the trajectory is similar:

1. Activate potential.

2. Narrow it.

3. Fix it.

Capture is treated as completion.

But capture always comes at a cost: the reduction of surplus.

---

3. What Nonsense Does Differently

Nonsense activates meaning locally — but refuses to let activation collapse into capture.

Consider a familiar example from Lewis Carroll’s Jabberwocky in Through the Looking-Glass:

• Grammar is intact.

• Syntactic roles are stable.

• Patterns of action and agency are clear.

Readers construe processes, entities, qualities.

Yet no stable referential world is locked in place.

Activation occurs.

Exhaustion does not.

The system remains open.

---

4. The Mechanics of Non-Exhaustion

How does nonsense prevent capture?

1. Lexical deferral — invented or unstable terms resist final anchoring.

2. Pattern without resolution — rhythm and repetition generate expectation without doctrinal closure.

3. Semantic surplus — multiple plausible construals remain viable.

The key is not ambiguity for its own sake.

It is disciplined indeterminacy.

Structure holds.

Reference floats.

Meaning is enacted — not sealed.

---

5. Why Exhaustion Is Not Necessary

There is a persistent assumption that unless potential is reduced to a stable endpoint, meaning remains incomplete.

Nonsense exposes the illusion.

Meaning does not require exhaustion to function.

It requires structured activation.

Once activation has occurred — once patterns are recognised, relations construed, tensions felt — meaning is operative.

Closure is optional.

This is the radical demonstration.

---

6. The Preservation of Surplus

By refusing capture, nonsense preserves systemic surplus.

Surplus is not vagueness.

It is unrealised potential within the structured field.

Preserved surplus allows:

• Future reinterpretation

• Alternative trajectories

• Adaptive flexibility

In ecological terms, nonsense maintains biodiversity in the semiotic environment.

Activation happens.

But the field remains fertile.

---

7. Technology, Not Accident

This is not incidental.

Nonsense is constructed to operate this way.

It is a repeatable practice:

• Constrain structure.

• Activate locally.

• Resist exhaustion.

The result is a disciplined encounter with structured potential that does not pretend to collapse into finality.

That is the technology.

---

In Post III, we move from system-level dynamics to reader-level conditioning:

Training in Indeterminacy — how engagement with nonsense cultivates tolerance for incompleteness and strengthens the capacity to navigate surplus without demanding capture.