Nonsense vs. Mythology: VII — Conclusion — The Ecology of Meaning Revealed: Nonsense, Mythology, and the Relational Field of Meaning

We have journeyed through the relational contrasts between nonsense and mythology:

• Activation without codification

• Surplus vs. normativity

• Thresholds and transformation

• Pattern, structure, and activation

• Collective vs. local semiotic ecology

• Inexhaustibility vs. resonance

Taken together, these posts reveal an essential insight: meaning is ecological, relational, and generative.

---

1. Complementary Technologies of Meaning

Nonsense and mythology are not rivals; they are complementary technologies:

• Mythology stabilises, encodes, and channels meaning. It provides continuity, archetypal resonance, and collective guidance.

• Nonsense activates, rehearses, and preserves surplus. It provides flexibility, multiplicity, and relational skill.

Both are necessary to maintain the health of the semiotic ecosystem. Without mythology, coherence and collective memory erode. Without nonsense, interpretive potential and generative capacity stagnate.

---

2. Activation and Capture

Throughout this series, a single principle recurs: activation precedes capture.

• Meaning arises first in relational engagement, in the field of activation, in rehearsal and threshold navigation.

• Codification, resonance, and normative sediment follow, stabilising what has already been activated.

• Nonsense foregrounds this principle, reminding us that possibility is primary. Mythology codifies it, ensuring endurance.

In short: activation and capture are complementary moves in the ecology of meaning.

---

3. The Field of Meaning as Ecology

By attending to scale, pattern, threshold, and temporal orientation, we see that meaning is not singular, static, or hierarchical. It thrives across interacting fields:

• Local and immediate (nonsense)

• Collective and enduring (mythology)

• Structured and generative

• Codified and resonant

This ecology allows surplus and sediment, multiplicity and coherence, flexibility and endurance to coexist. It is relational, dynamic, and inexhaustible.

---

4. Reflection

The contrast between nonsense and mythology illuminates how meaning is actually produced:

• Through relational activation, not solely through codified authority.

• Through rehearsal and threshold engagement, not only through fixed interpretation.

• Through balance between preservation and sedimentation, not by enforcing either alone.

In attending to both nonsense and mythology, we perceive a richer, more honest picture of the semiotic ecosystem: one that preserves possibility while sustaining coherence, one that teaches us to navigate thresholds, interpret surplus, and cultivate meaning across both time and scale.

---

5. Closing Thought

Meaning is not captured once and for all. It is co-activated, rehearsed, and renewed. Mythology gives it weight and endurance; nonsense gives it breadth and possibility. Together, they show us that the field of meaning is alive, relational, and ecological, always inviting exploration, always sustaining potential, always resonating.

In the ecology of meaning, both activation and sediment are indispensable — and both are most visible when they dance together.