When we consider the technologies of meaning, two patterns immediately emerge: the codified and the provisional.
Mythology codifies. It draws on archetypes, shared stories, and repeated rituals to stabilise interpretation across time and community. Its power lies in continuity: meaning is anchored to tradition, reinforced by repetition, and distributed collectively. Thresholds, taboos, and heroics are stabilised; the field of activation is constrained, yet coherent.
Nonsense, by contrast, activates. Meaning emerges relationally, in the moment, without codification. It relies on patterned structure — metre, syntax, lexical echoes — but it refuses to fix its interpretive potential. Surplus is preserved; multiple pathways of meaning remain open. Its field is local, immediate, and inexhaustible.
1. Temporality and Orientation
Mythology situates meaning in temporal continuity. Legends persist across generations; the symbolic resonance of a story is reinforced precisely because it endures. The archetypal patterns do not merely guide interpretation—they anchor it, giving readers and listeners a shared horizon.
Nonsense, however, operates within the instant of engagement. Its structures constrain activation but do not impose long-term codification. The field is dynamic: multiple meanings can co-exist simultaneously, and activation occurs without requiring historical sediment.
-
Mythology: temporally cumulative, socially stabilising.
-
Nonsense: temporally local, relationally activating.
2. Constraint Without Fixation
Both systems rely on constraint to function:
-
Mythology constrains through narrative conventions, archetypal templates, and culturally sanctioned thresholds.
-
Nonsense constrains through formal patterning — rhythm, repetition, syntactic symmetry — without asserting referential or moral authority.
The crucial difference: constraint in nonsense preserves multiplicity, whereas constraint in mythology channels meaning toward coherence and collective stability.
This demonstrates that activation and fixation are separable. A system can produce compelling meaning without closure, just as it can produce closure without local activation.
3. Local Activation as Technology
Nonsense functions as a technology of local activation:
-
It trains readers to navigate multiple interpretive pathways simultaneously.
-
It rehearses thresholds of comprehension and expectation without collapse.
-
It foregrounds relational meaning, allowing the field to remain rich and inexhaustible.
In this sense, nonsense is a laboratory of possibility. It shows that meaning does not require codification or sedimentation to be real. Patterns alone are sufficient to sustain activation, provided the surplus is preserved.
4. Complementarity and Ecological Insight
Viewed ecologically, nonsense and mythology are complementary technologies:
-
Mythology ensures continuity, resonance, and shared interpretive horizons.
-
Nonsense ensures flexibility, multiplicity, and inexhaustible potential.
Together, they reveal a relational ecology in which meaning emerges across scales: local and immediate, collective and enduring.
Nonsense exposes what codified systems obscure: activation is primary; capture is optional. Mythology shows us that continuity is valuable—but only if balanced with openness and surplus.
5. Conclusion
By contrasting this with mythology, we see that meaning is not inherently anchored to tradition, nor is it inherently fleeting. It is relational, emergent, and ecological — a dynamic interplay of constraint, surplus, and threshold navigation.
Nonsense, in the face of mythology’s codification, reminds us that possibility, multiplicity, and local activation are themselves indispensable dimensions of meaning.
No comments:
Post a Comment