Tuesday, 24 February 2026

Nonsense vs. Mythology: VI — Inexhaustibility and Resonance: How Nonsense and Mythology Sustain Meaning Through Different Temporal Orientations

In our exploration so far, we have examined thresholds, patterns, activation, and ecological scale. Now we turn to a final functional contrast: how nonsense and mythology sustain meaning over time — or, more precisely, how they handle the tension between inexhaustibility and resonance.


1. Mythology: Resonance Across Time

Mythology ensures durable significance:

  • Archetypes, legends, and rituals are repeated and sedimented across generations.

  • Meaning resonates: patterns, thresholds, and narrative arcs echo through cultural memory.

  • In doing so, mythology provides coherence, guidance, and continuity.

Resonance is the hallmark of mythology. Meaning is captured, not in a rigid or totalising sense, but in a way that endures and aligns collective interpretation.


2. Nonsense: Inexhaustible Potential

Nonsense, by contrast, foregrounds surplus and inexhaustibility:

  • Every encounter produces activation, interpretation, and relational engagement that cannot be fully exhausted.

  • The interpretive field remains open; multiplicity is preserved rather than channelled.

  • Inexhaustibility is not accidental: it is a structural feature of nonsense, encoded through pattern, play, and relational constraints.

Here, meaning is dynamic, emergent, and generative. The field itself is alive, and activation does not require sedimented reference.


3. Comparative Insight

AspectMythologyNonsense
Temporal FocusEnduring resonanceLocal, inexhaustible potential
FunctionStability, guidance, shared significanceActivation, multiplicity, rehearsal of thresholds
SurplusReduced, channelledPreserved, generative
Mode of MeaningSedimented, codifiedRelational, emergent
Contribution to EcologyLong-term coherenceSustains generative capacity

The contrast highlights a profound truth: durability and inexhaustibility are complementary. Meaning needs both: resonance to endure, surplus to regenerate.


4. Complementary Temporal Dynamics

In the semiotic ecosystem:

  • Mythology provides temporal anchoring. Without it, collective coherence erodes; patterns lose social force.

  • Nonsense provides temporal fluidity. Without it, meaning becomes rigid, closure becomes dogma, and thresholds cease to be rehearsed.

  • Together, they create a temporal ecology: the endurance of resonance, balanced by the immediacy of activation.

Nonsense teaches us that meaning can be infinite without being incoherent, just as mythology teaches that meaning can endure without exhausting potential.


5. Reflection

Inexhaustibility and resonance are two faces of the same semiotic principle. Nonsense preserves relational potential, multiplicity, and activation; mythology preserves interpretive continuity, collective resonance, and codified thresholds.

By attending to both, we perceive the full architecture of meaning:

  • Activation and capture are not opposed; they are complementary.

  • Surplus and sediment are not enemies; they sustain each other.

  • Meaning thrives when the field is both generative and resonant.

This sets the stage for our concluding reflection: how these two technologies together illuminate the ecology of meaning itself.

No comments:

Post a Comment