At some point, a familiar anxiety surfaces.
If there is no destination, what justifies the journey? If nothing culminates, what secures meaning? Without destiny, does significance dissolve into drift?
These questions feel unavoidable because we have learned to tether meaning to ends.
This episode cuts that tether.
Destiny as Narrative Prosthesis
Destiny functions as a guarantee.
It reassures us that movement is justified in advance, that endurance will be redeemed, that ambiguity is only provisional. Destiny promises that meaning will eventually be delivered—even if it is deferred.
But destiny is not a neutral feature of myth.
It is a compensatory device, introduced where uncertainty becomes intolerable. When the present cannot carry its own weight, destiny is invoked to stabilise it retroactively.
Meaning, under destiny, is always about to arrive.
The Cost of Arrival
When meaning is tied to arrival, the present becomes instrumental.
Moments are valuable only insofar as they contribute to an outcome. Attention is justified by payoff. Persistence is measured by progress. What does not advance the plot is treated as delay.
This logic quietly disciplines experience.
It teaches us to endure rather than inhabit, to tolerate rather than attend. It trains us to live toward meaning instead of within it.
Meaning as Sustained Relation
Myth without closure proposes a different account.
Meaning does not wait at the end. It arises through sustained relation. It is enacted, not delivered; maintained, not achieved.
This does not make meaning fragile in the pejorative sense. It makes it situated. Meaning holds only so long as relations are held. It persists through care, not through guarantee.
There is no final account that secures it once and for all.
The Figure at the Horizon
The horizon appears again.
It does not draw nearer. It does not resolve into destination. It orients without promising arrival. The figure walks toward it—not because she expects to reach it, but because it gives direction without command.
The horizon does not lie.
It simply refuses to conclude.
Against Nihilism
The refusal of destiny is often mistaken for nihilism.
If there is no final meaning, the argument goes, then nothing ultimately matters. But this inference assumes that mattering requires culmination.
It does not.
Some meanings matter precisely because they cannot be secured. Care matters because it can fail. Attention matters because it can lapse. Relation matters because it must be renewed.
Meaning without destiny is not emptier.
It is more demanding.
Ethical Time
Without destiny, time changes character.
It is no longer a corridor leading elsewhere, but a field in which relations must be continually re-established. Ethical life becomes less about reaching the right end-state and more about sustaining responsiveness over duration.
This is slower.
And it is harder.
What Endures
What endures, in myth without destiny, is not a result but a posture.
These are not heroic virtues.
They are relational ones.
Walking Without Promise
The figure continues.
There is no final scene that will gather her movement into meaning. No revelation waits ahead. And yet her walking is not empty. Each step reaffirms a relation: to the path, to the horizon, to the world that responds without guaranteeing.
Meaning does not arrive.
It is carried.
No comments:
Post a Comment