Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Myth Without Closure: 2 Myth as Inhabitation, Not Explanation

If myth is not explanation, what remains?

For readers trained to equate meaning with answers, this question can feel destabilising. Explanation reassures. It promises an account that settles uncertainty, a structure that can be stepped back from once understood. Myth offers no such distance. It does not explain the world from the outside. It asks us to enter.

This is the hinge on which the entire series turns.


Explanation Stands Apart

Explanation presumes separation. There is a world “out there” and a mind “in here,” and explanation bridges the gap by representation. Once the bridge is built, the task is complete. One may cross, verify, and move on.

This posture has extraordinary power. It gives us science, engineering, medicine, and much of what makes modern life possible. But it also trains a particular habit of sense-making: meaning as something extracted, stabilised, and stored.

Myth does not operate this way.

Where explanation stands apart, myth situates. Where explanation concludes, myth persists. Where explanation reduces complexity to what can be handled, myth teaches us how to remain with what cannot be resolved.


Inhabitation

To inhabit is not to understand from above, but to dwell from within.

We inhabit houses, not by explaining their structure, but by learning their sounds, their light, their thresholds and corners. We inhabit landscapes not by mapping them exhaustively, but by discovering where the ground yields, where it resists, where one pauses and where one proceeds with care.

Myth works in this way.

A myth is not something one decodes. It is something one learns to live inside. Its meaning is not delivered all at once, nor can it be paraphrased without loss. It unfolds through repeated encounter, through return, through patience.

This is why myth has rhythm.


Rhythm Rather Than Sequence

Explanation prefers sequence: first this, then that, therefore the other.

Myth prefers rhythm.

Rhythm does not aim at completion. It establishes a pattern of return. What matters is not that something ends, but that it can be taken up again—differently, attentively, without exhaustion.

This is why myths survive retelling. Each telling re-relates the elements without exhausting them. The story does not progress toward final disclosure; it deepens its hold through resonance.

Rhythm is how time becomes inhabitable.


A Path, Not a Map

A map aspires to totality. It seeks to show everything at once, from nowhere in particular. Its value lies in coverage and accuracy.

A path does something else.

A path only exists by being walked. It discloses itself gradually, in response to movement, weather, fatigue, attention. One cannot know the path in advance without ceasing to walk it.

Myth is a path, not a map.

It does not offer an overview of reality. It offers a way through it.


The Figure Returns

The figure walks again.

Not along a straight road, but along a winding track that disappears and reappears as light shifts. Sometimes she pauses—not because she is lost, but because the world has asked for stillness. Sometimes she turns back, not to correct a mistake, but to re-encounter what now looks different.

Nothing accumulates. No progress is measured.

And yet something holds.


Why This Matters Now

A culture saturated with explanation risks forgetting how to inhabit meaning. When every question is treated as a problem to be solved, what cannot be solved begins to feel like a failure.

Myth offers a counter-practice.

It does not deny explanation; it brackets it. It reminds us that not all forms of sense-making aim at resolution, and that some forms of meaning only emerge through duration, repetition, and care.

This is not nostalgia. It is a discipline.


Holding the Hinge

Between explanation and myth there is no simple opposition. The danger lies not in explanation itself, but in mistaking explanation for the only legitimate mode of understanding.

Myth keeps open a space explanation cannot occupy.

It teaches us how to dwell without closure, how to remain oriented without final accounts, how to continue without guarantees.

The figure does not explain the path.

She inhabits it.

No comments:

Post a Comment