No Synthesis
This series does not end with reconciliation.
Coordination and meaning do not resolve into a higher unity. They are not dialectical opposites awaiting synthesis. They are different modes of organisation that coexist uneasily, each undermining the other in specific ways.
To seek a final integration is already to misunderstand the problem.
The Persistent Fracture
Coordination requires constraint, predictability, and indifference to interpretation. Meaning requires openness, ambiguity, and tolerance for excess. Each flourishes where the other is weakened.
This fracture is not a historical accident. It is structural.
Attempts to erase it — by moralising systems or instrumentalising meaning — inevitably collapse one side into the other. Either meaning is reduced to function, or coordination is paralysed by interpretation.
Both outcomes are failures of attention.
Knowing When Not to Repair
Living with the tension requires a cultivated restraint: knowing when not to fix, optimise, or explain.
There are situations that demand coordination without hesitation.
There are others that demand meaning even at the cost of efficiency.
Wisdom lies not in choosing one once and for all, but in recognising which mode is being asked for — and refusing to smuggle the other in by force.
Protection Without Justification
Meaning cannot justify itself in systemic terms.
It does not make systems work better.
It makes them harder to run.
And yet, it is precisely this difficulty that must be protected. Meaning survives only where it is allowed to be unnecessary, inefficient, and excessive.
To protect meaning is therefore not to defend it with arguments of utility, but to refuse its conscription.
Coordination Without Innocence
Equally, coordination must be seen without romance.
Efficient systems are not ethical by default. Their success does not confer moral standing. Coordination can produce stability, abundance, and safety — but also exclusion, harm, and indifference.
Seeing coordination clearly means abandoning the hope that efficiency will save us.
An Ongoing Practice
Living with the tension between coordination and meaning is not a theoretical achievement. It is a practice.
It requires attention.
It requires patience.
It requires the courage to let some things break so that others can matter.
Leaving the Door Open
This series ends where it must: without closure.
Coordination continues.
Meaning continues to interrupt it.
Neither wins.
The task is not to resolve the tension, but to remain responsive within it — protecting meaning without pretending it is harmless, and using coordination without pretending it is wise.
That is not a solution.
It is a way of staying awake.
No comments:
Post a Comment