The second predictable question arrives almost immediately:
If reality depends on construal, why isn’t anything possible?
Or more bluntly:
what stops this from collapsing into “anything goes”?
This is not a superficial objection.
It is the point where most attempts to move beyond independence fail.
1. The Hidden Assumption
The worry about arbitrariness relies on a familiar structure:
either reality is independent and fixed
or it is dependent and therefore unconstrained
So once independence is removed, the expectation is:
constraint disappears with it.
This expectation is incorrect.
Because it assumes:
constraint must come from an independent reality.
That is precisely what the framework rejects.
2. Constraint Does Not Depend on Independence
Constraint is not:
imposed by an external world
enforced by underlying objects
guaranteed by independent structure
Constraint is:
the relational delimitation of what can and cannot stabilise together.
This means:
some distinctions hold
some collapse
some configurations stabilise
others fail to cohere
These are not optional.
They are structural.
3. Construal Is Not Free
If construal were:
arbitrary interpretation
subjective projection
unconstrained framing
then the objection would be correct.
But construal is none of these.
Construal is:
articulation of relational structure under constraint.
Which means:
you can attempt any articulation
but only some will stabilise
So the space of possible construals is not open-ended.
It is:
constrained from within the relational structure itself.
4. Failure Is Built In
This is the crucial point.
Not every construal succeeds.
In fact, most do not.
They fail by:
collapsing into inconsistency
failing to stabilise distinctions
breaking invariance under re-articulation
producing no persistent structure
This failure is not:
subjective disagreement
pragmatic inconvenience
It is:
structural impossibility of stabilisation.
5. Stability Is Not Optional
What we call “reality” is not:
what is asserted
what is imagined
what is proposed
It is:
what stabilises under constraint across admissible construals.
This introduces a hard condition:
if it does not stabilise, it is not actualised
if it is not actualised, it does not count as real
So arbitrariness is blocked not by external policing, but by:
failure to stabilise.
6. Why This Is Not Relativism
Relativism says:
different perspectives generate different realities.
This framework says:
different articulations are possible, but not all are admissible, and not all that are admissible stabilise equally.
So:
there is variation
but not equivalence
there is plurality
but not arbitrariness
What distinguishes outcomes is:
invariance under constraint.
7. Objectivity Reappears (Without Independence)
We do not lose objectivity.
We relocate it.
Objectivity is:
what remains invariant across admissible construals.
So:
if a pattern persists under multiple articulations
if it remains stable under transformation
if it resists collapse
then it is objective.
Not because it is independent.
But because:
it cannot be otherwise within the constraint structure.
8. The Source of the Confusion
The arbitrariness worry arises from a simple misstep:
- removing independence→ and assuming this removes constraint
But in this framework:
constraint is more fundamental than independence ever was
Independence tried to guarantee stability from “outside.”
Constraint guarantees it from “within.”
9. The Real Picture
We can now state the situation precisely:
construal is necessary for determinacy
constraint limits what can be articulated coherently
actualisation occurs only where articulation stabilises under constraint
So the system is:
open in articulation
closed in admissibility
selective in stabilisation
There is no arbitrariness here.
There is:
structured possibility with built-in failure conditions.
10. The Short Answer
Why isn’t everything arbitrary?
Because:
most articulations do not survive.
Next
The next question follows naturally:
If there is no independent reality, what is actually there?
That will be the focus of Post 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment