At this point, a larger concern emerges:
If there is no independent reality to get closer to, what could progress possibly mean?
Or more sharply:
without a fixed target, isn’t the idea of progress empty?
This concern is understandable.
But it rests on a specific picture of what progress is.
1. The Classical Model of Progress
Progress is typically understood as:
moving closer to how things really are
improving correspondence between theory and reality
reducing error relative to an independent world
On this view:
progress is directional because reality is fixed.
Remove independence, and it seems:
the direction disappears.
2. Why This Model Fails
The classical model depends on:
a fully specified reality
a way of measuring distance from it
a standard external to articulation
None of these are available.
So the idea of progress as:
approximation to an independent truth
cannot be maintained.
3. What Must Be Preserved
If progress is to remain meaningful, it must retain:
non-arbitrariness
directionality
the ability to distinguish improvement from regression
Without these, “progress” becomes:
mere change
shifting preference
historical drift
That is not sufficient.
4. Progress Re-specified
Within the constraint–construal–actualisation framework, progress is not:
getting closer to an independent reality
It is:
increasing stability, scope, and integration of articulation under constraint.
This gives progress a new structure.
5. Expansion of Stability
One dimension of progress is:
stability under wider variation.
A theory progresses when:
it continues to hold under conditions where earlier versions failed
it resists collapse under transformation
it maintains coherence across change
Progress is:
the extension of what can stabilise.
6. Increase in Scope
Another dimension:
broader admissible application.
A more advanced articulation:
applies across more domains
captures more relations within a unified structure
reduces fragmentation
This is not mere generalisation.
It is:
sustained stability across a wider field.
7. Deepening Integration
Progress also involves:
increased integration with other stable structures.
A theory improves when it:
connects with neighbouring domains
aligns with other invariances
supports mutual reinforcement
Progress is:
the reduction of isolated articulation.
8. Sharpening of Invariance
A further dimension:
more precise tracking of invariance.
A stronger theory:
identifies deeper regularities
distinguishes what is essential from what is incidental
captures what cannot vary
Progress is:
refinement of what holds.
9. Elimination of Failure
Progress also occurs through:
removal of unstable articulation.
As ideas are tested:
inconsistencies are exposed
limitations are revealed
weak structures collapse
What remains is:
more robust stabilisation.
So progress includes:
pruning as well as expansion.
10. Direction Without a Target
These dimensions provide direction without requiring:
an external endpoint
a final, complete theory
a fixed reality to approximate
Progress is directional because:
constraint structures what can stabilise.
Movement is not toward a pre-given destination.
It is:
toward greater structural robustness.
11. Why This Is Not Relativism
Progress is not:
arbitrary change
shifting perspective
social preference
Because:
not all articulations improve stability
not all extensions succeed
not all integrations hold
The direction is not chosen.
It is:
enforced by constraint.
12. The Reframed Picture
We can now state progress precisely:
not approach to independent reality
but development of articulation that
stabilises more broadly
integrates more deeply
tracks invariance more precisely
Progress is:
the increasing ability of structure to hold under constraint.
13. The Short Answer
Is progress still possible without an independent reality?
Yes.
Because:
progress is not movement toward independence, but expansion of stable articulation under constraint.
Next
The final question in this series:
What replaces objectivity in practice?
That will be the focus of Post 6.
No comments:
Post a Comment