What if empathy isn’t what you think it is?
Most of us assume empathy means feeling what others feel, agreeing with them, or sharing their perspective. Yet these assumptions often lead to misunderstanding, frustration, and even harm. Empathy Without Collapse challenges that notion, showing empathy as a precise, disciplined act: a coordination across difference that preserves the other person as a centre of meaning without erasing them. Over eight posts, the series traces why empathy so often fails, what it truly requires, and why its fragility is exactly what makes it so powerful.
Empathy is one of the virtues most celebrated—and most misunderstood—in our social and moral imagination. We are told it is essential to care, understanding, and connection. Yet it often fails in ways that leave both parties frustrated, misread, or alienated.
This series, Empathy Without Collapse, takes a closer look at why that happens—and what empathy actually requires. Over eight posts, we explore empathy not as feeling, agreement, or moral alignment, but as a disciplined act of orientation: a coordination across perspectives that preserves difference while making understanding possible.
The series begins with the everyday experience of empathy going wrong, moves through a careful disentangling of feeling and understanding, introduces the concept of perspective and the empathic cut, and ends with a precise account of empathy’s fragility and ethical demand.
Readers who follow the series will discover that empathy is neither a soft skill nor a moral ornament. It is a rare, exacting practice that requires attention, restraint, and a willingness to navigate another person’s meaning without replacing or erasing it.
No comments:
Post a Comment