If the recent trilogy traced the deep evolution of potential, The General Ecology of Meaning takes up the next problem:
Here ecology means:
-
a field of structured potential (system) that precedes and exceeds any given event;
-
a dynamic of co-instantiation, where each act of meaning shifts the very conditions of meaning’s future possibilities;
-
a relational topology that holds phenomena, metaphenomena, and theories of meaning in perpetual tension.
This ecology is not a “system” in the reductive cybernetic sense, nor an organismic unity, nor a neutral medium. It is a stratified relational interiority, a meaning-bearing milieu that organisms do not live in, but co-instantiate through construal.
The key commitments guiding the series:
-
Meaning is ecological because it is relational and stratified, not contained within minds or utterances but distributed across the system/instance dynamic.
-
Context (field, tenor, mode) remains a contextual stratum realised by semantics—not collapsed into register nor confused with social value systems.
-
Every act of meaning shifts the ecology, because actualisation is perspectival: each instance re-cuts the potential, altering the field of future possible construals.
-
Meaning is not grounded in representation but in relational individuation: the co-emergence of perspectives, potentials, and phenomena.
-
Ecology is not metaphorical—it is the most precise concept for the dynamic organisation of symbolic potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment