Semiosis, Cosmos, Mythos: 7 Mythic Cosmologies as Horizon Modulators

Having explored emergent order and cosmic construals, we now turn to myth as a relational mechanism that stabilises and orients semiotic potential across scales. Myths function as horizon modulators, bridging human, cultural, and cosmic relational dynamics, and enabling recursive alignment of meaning across temporal, spatial, and symbolic fields.

---

1. Myths as Relational Scaffolds

Myth is often misinterpreted as “story” or symbolic fiction. From a relational perspective:

• Myths are structural frameworks that stabilise relational potential.

• They act as scaffolds, enabling humans to interpret, integrate, and propagate cosmic-scale semiotic dynamics.

• By framing relational fields in symbolic form, myths coordinate individual, collective, and cosmic horizons.

Example: Creation myths do not merely narrate origins; they provide patterned construals that guide cultural perception, action, and alignment with the cosmos.

---

2. Recursive Patterns Across Horizons

Mythic structures operate recursively:

• Human horizon: individual and collective construals stabilised into enduring narratives.

• Cultural horizon: institutional and social semiotic structures emerge from recursive application of mythic patterns.

• Cosmic horizon: myth enables symbolic engagement with cosmic relational alignments, allowing humans to participate in interpreting and modulating large-scale semiotic potentials.

Recursive layering ensures that myths mediate across scales, preserving coherence while maintaining softness and openness for reinterpretation and innovation.

---

3. Myth as Horizon Modulator

Myths function dynamically to shape semiotic potential:

1. Orientational function: Myths establish reference points and relational axes for interpretation.

2. Integrative function: They align distributed semiotic events, stabilising cross-domain and cross-scale coherence.

3. Generative function: Myths catalyse new construals and symbolic innovations, feeding back into cultural and semiotic evolution.

Myths are not static templates; they are adaptive, recursive regulators of relational potential, modulating horizons across human and cosmic scales.

---

4. Implications for Relational Semiotics

1. Mythic relationality: Myths extend semiotic scaffolds to cosmic-scale relational dynamics.

2. Cross-scale coherence: By linking human, cultural, and cosmic horizons, myths enable nested semiotic stability.

3. Soft infinity: Mythic horizons preserve generative potential, allowing continuous reinterpretation and emergent symbolic innovation.

4. Cosmic participation: Humans, through myth, actively engage with cosmic relational fields, aligning semiotic potential across scales.

---

5. Takeaway

• Myths act as relational scaffolds, stabilising and modulating semiotic horizons.

• Recursive mythic patterns connect human cognition, cultural evolution, and cosmic relational fields.

• Mythic cosmologies are dynamic, adaptive, and generative, enabling humans to interpret, participate in, and extend relational potential at the largest scales.

• Through myth, semiotic life enters dialogue with the cosmos itself, preparing the ground for Post 8 — Story at Cosmic Scales, where narrative and metaphenomena extend the relational ecology of meaning across temporal and spatial infinity.

Myth is the horizon of interpretability: it shapes, stabilises, and recursively aligns relational potentials from human perception to cosmic order, bridging semiotic and cosmic scales in the becoming of meaningful structure.