This overview maps the eight-post series from the seduction of formal necessity to a relationally-grounded practice of mathematics and modelling. It highlights the internal logic, key relational moves, and two overarching threads: the critique of mathematical metaphysics and the reassertion of semiotic awareness.
Thread 1: The Mathematical Critique
This thread traces the historical and structural migration of mathematical closure into ontological and social authority.
Post 1 — The Seduction of Formal Necessity
Introduces the core problem: formal coherence masquerading as reality.
Key relational move: highlighting how internal consistency of systems leads to perceived inevitability.
Sets the analytic spine: formal closure → metaphysical inevitability.
Post 2 — Pythagoras: Number as Sacred Closure
Examines the first major export of mathematical inclination into ontology.
Key move: number as cosmic principle rather than tool; moralisation of proportion and harmony.
Post 3 — Plato: Form Without Horizon
Shows how over-stabilisation of formal cuts leads to the removal of horizon and perspectival construal.
Key move: mathematics becomes the privileged access to “what truly is,” over-closure becomes metaphysics.
Post 4 — From Form to Law: The Birth of Ontological Necessity
Demonstrates the migration from metaphysical form to law-like governance.
Key move: law treated as explanation and compulsion; derivation equated with inevitability.
Post 5 — Physics as the Apotheosis of Mathematical Ontology
Integrates the previous physics critique into the historical arc.
Key move: singularities, infinities, collapse, and renormalisation as symptoms of over-closure; mathematics forgotten as semiotic practice.
Post 6 — Over-Closure Everywhere
Extends the critique beyond physics to economics, algorithmic governance, and optimisation culture.
Key move: the phrase “the model says” demonstrates closure without relation as systemic pathology.
Thread 2: The Semiotic Reorientation
This thread foregrounds relational ontology and the restoration of mathematics as construal rather than being.
Post 7 — Re-Opening Ontology
Reclaims horizon, relation, and cut.
Key move: form as orientation, not essence; mathematics as disciplined construal; ontology re-grounded relationally.
Post 8 — Meaning After Number
Synthesises the series and outlines the forward-looking implications.
Key move: mathematics retains power without authority; possibility survives only where closure is resisted; inclination treated as first-class concept for modelling practice.
Internal Logic and Progression
Diagnosis: Posts 1–6 trace how mathematical inclination migrates and hardens into metaphysical and social authority.
Re-grounding: Posts 7–8 restore the semiotic cut, horizon, and relational orientation, enabling mathematics and modelling to be powerful without claiming inevitability.
Structural Consistency: Each post identifies closure, over-closure, and the forgetting of relation, then progressively widens the scope from metaphysics to physics to society.
Key Relational Moves Across the Series
Identification of over-closure: recognising when formal systems suppress horizon.
Tracing migration of authority: showing how closure becomes treated as ontological necessity.
Integration of semiotic awareness: restoring cuts, construal, and perspectival orientation.
Reclaiming mathematics as practice: separating symbolic power from metaphysical pretension.
Extension beyond domain: demonstrating that over-closure occurs wherever models forget their relational roots.
Series Takeaways
Mathematical closure has historically been misread as metaphysical or social necessity.
Over-closure manifests across physics, economics, algorithmic governance, and optimisation culture.
Relational ontology restores semiotic awareness, acknowledging horizon, cut, and inclination.
Mathematics is powerful when treated as disciplined construal, not as reality itself.
Possibility survives only when closure is explicit, accountable, and responsive.
The series thus provides both a diagnostic framework and a constructive pathway, showing how to retain the effectiveness of mathematical and symbolic systems while avoiding the pathologies of over-closure.
No comments:
Post a Comment