Tracing the gradient of collective actualisation across life.
Across the living world, collective action is ubiquitous—but the way it is enacted shifts systematically with scale, autonomy, and the mode of coordination. From colonial organisms to eusocial insects, from vertebrate societies to human symbolic worlds, a gradient of collective actualisation emerges:
Ability → Inclination → Symbolic Ability.
This post draws together the series, revealing the ontological pattern underlying these diverse modes of social and collective life.
1. Visualising the Gradient
| Scale | Mode of Agency | Perspectival Loci | Individuation | Collective Coherence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonial/Eusocial | Ability | Cells / Workers / Polyps | Minimal; largely structural | Emergent from architecture and role distribution |
| Vertebrate | Inclination | Individual animals | Graded; flexible, context-dependent | Emergent from alignment of relational biases |
| Human | Symbolic Ability | Individuals inhabiting roles and norms | Semiotic; perspectival and interpretive | Emergent from alignment within symbolic fields |
At each stage, coherence arises from alignment—structural, relational, or semiotic—but the locus of agency migrates with increasing individuation and complexity.
2. Perspectival Loci and Individuation
-
In colonial and eusocial systems, agency is embedded in the structure. Cells, polyps, or workers execute actions prefigured by collective architecture.
-
In vertebrates, agency is distributed relationally: each individual interprets and enacts local inclinations that collectively generate coherent social behaviour.
-
In humans, agency is semiotically mediated: symbols, norms, and institutions scaffold coordinated action across space, time, and social complexity.
Individuation is always perspectival: a locus interprets and enacts readiness, and the collective emerges from these perspectival enactments.
3. Ontological Implications
-
Individuality is graded, not binary.
-
Collective action is never reducible to genes, mechanics, or structure alone.
-
Coherence is relational: it emerges wherever perspectival alignment is enacted.
-
Agency migrates ontologically, reflecting both autonomy and the mode of coordination at each scale.
This lens dissolves traditional conflicts in biology and philosophy:
-
Between organism and colony
-
Between cooperation and individuality
-
Between relational and symbolic perspectives
All are facets of the same underlying principle: alignment of readiness across perspectival loci.
4. Evolutionary and Philosophical Consequences
-
Natural selection acts differently at each level: structural ability, relational inclination, or symbolic potential.
-
Evo-devo, behavioural ecology, and social evolution can be conceptually unified through readiness fields.
-
The framework anticipates post-human socialities, AI-mediated collectives, and semiotic systems extending coordination beyond biological life.
In short, life—at every scale—is a field of possibility, dynamically interpreted by perspectival agents.
5. Mythic Closure: Liora and the Migration of Agency
Liora traversed worlds of collective life:
-
She witnessed a spinning sphere of Volvox cells, each enacting distributed ability.
-
She wandered among gelada fields, sensing layers of attentional bias and alliance.
-
She walked through human cities, where roles, norms, and symbols shaped collective readiness across generations.
At every scale, she saw the same ontological pattern: agency migrates, coherence emerges, individuality is graded, and life unfolds as a field of interpreted possibilities.
Through this lens, the gradient from ability to inclination to symbolic ability is no mere taxonomy—it is a deep ontological principle of life itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment