If ideology is not belief, then the object it was supposed to name begins to slip.
it must be re-approached.
1. The appearance of coherence
Ideology presents itself as something remarkably stable:
- a position
- a perspective
- a way of seeing the world
It appears:
- internally consistent
- externally recognisable
- attributable to individuals or groups
This is the illusion.
2. Two operations, one appearance
At minimum, what we call ideology involves two distinct operations:
(a) Semiotic construal (meaning)
- categories (e.g. “freedom,” “order,” “fairness”)
- narratives (progress, decline, threat, restoration)
- distinctions (us/them, legitimate/illegitimate, natural/unnatural)
These do not describe a pre-given world.
They bring forth a world as meaningful.
(b) Social alignment (value)
- affiliations (party, movement, identity)
- practices (voting, speech, participation)
- evaluations (approval, outrage, dismissal)
These do not express meaning.
They coordinate behaviour and expectation.
3. No shared ground
These two operations do not converge into a single system.
- meaning operates through construal
- value operates through coordination
They do not:
- derive from one another
- reduce to one another
- share a common substance
And yet—
they appear unified.
4. The illicit unity
What we call ideology is precisely this:
the stabilised coupling of meaning and value, misrecognised as a coherent position.
- narratives seem to justify alignments
- alignments seem to express narratives
The relation disappears.
Unity appears.
5. Reality as effect
Here ideology differs from religion and science in a crucial way.
It does not merely present itself as:
- belief (religion)
- knowledge (science)
It presents itself as:
reality.
- “that’s just how things are”
- “it’s obvious”
- “anyone can see it”
The coupling is not only stabilised.
It is naturalised.
6. The disappearance of construction
At this point, the operations vanish from view:
- construal is no longer seen as construal
- coordination is no longer seen as coordination
What remains is:
- facts
- common sense
- the way things are
Ideology succeeds when it ceases to appear as ideology.
7. The asymmetry returns
This explains the asymmetry noted at the outset:
- others are ideological
- we are realistic
Because:
- misaligned couplings are visible as ideology
- stabilised couplings are invisible as reality
Ideology is always what the other has.
Until the coupling shifts.
8. Fragility beneath stability
Despite its appearance, this unity is fragile.
Because it has no ground.
- meanings can drift
- alignments can shift
- articulations can loosen
When this happens, what seemed obvious becomes contested.
What seemed real becomes questionable.
The unity cracks.
9. Repair and reinforcement
When cracks appear, work begins:
- narratives are intensified
- alignments are enforced
- dissent is delegitimised
Not to restore truth.
But to re-stabilise the coupling.
10. Against reduction
Two familiar reductions now fail:
(a) Ideology as false belief
people believe incorrect things about the world
This assumes meaning is primary and correctable.
It ignores coordination.
(b) Ideology as power
ideology is a tool for domination
This assumes value is primary.
It ignores construal.
Both collapse the relation into one side.
Both miss the structure.
11. The analytic shift
Once the illicit unity is exposed, ideology changes form.
It is no longer:
- a set of ideas
- a doctrine
- a worldview
It becomes:
a dynamic relation between meaning and value,stabilised and naturalised as reality.
The task is no longer interpretation.
It is analysis of coupling.
12. The consequence
This reframing has an immediate consequence:
there is no position outside ideology.
Not because everything is “ideological” in a loose sense.
But because:
- all meaning is construed
- all action is coordinated
- their relation can always be stabilised and misrecognised
The analyst is not exempt.
Only differently positioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment