If the preceding posts have done their work, the phrase post-mythic world should now sound quietly wrong. There is no such place. And yet, something real is named by the aspiration: not the elimination of myth, but a different way of living with it.
To live after myth would be to imagine a position outside all structuring conditions of intelligibility — a view from nowhere. What is available to us instead is a reflective stance within myth: an awareness of the constraints that shape meaning, action, and value, coupled with a willingness to take responsibility for inhabiting them.
Awareness changes the quality of participation. When myths operate invisibly, they present themselves as necessity, inevitability, or nature. When they are seen as structural, they become navigable. Progress can be engaged without worship; rationality can be practised without absolutism; closure can be desired without being demanded. Myth ceases to masquerade as fate.
Freedom, on this account, does not consist in rejecting myths wholesale. That gesture merely installs another myth — usually the myth of transcendence or purity. Freedom lies in understanding how myths constrain possibility and then acting within those constraints with discernment. It is the freedom of skilled navigation, not escape.
This stance carries ethical weight. Because myths shape worlds, unreflective participation reproduces their distributions of power, authority, and exclusion. Reflective participation, by contrast, opens space for modulation, contestation, and care. Responsibility begins not with invention, but with acknowledgement: owning the cuts we inherit and the ones we continue to enact.
Seen this way, intelligibility itself is an ongoing construction. Worlds are not given once and for all; they are continuously stabilised through practices, narratives, and constraints. Living well, then, is not a matter of discovering final truths, but of sustaining habitable structures of meaning — knowing they could have been otherwise, and will change again.
This closes the third series and completes the triad. We began by loosening the grip of cosmic beginnings, moved through an understanding of myth as constraint, and arrived at a diagnostic awareness of the myths that quietly govern contemporary life. The destination is not demystification, but maturity: a way of thinking and acting that neither denies myth nor submits to it blindly.
There is no post-mythic world. But there is a post-innocent one — and that may be enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment