In the previous post, we argued that Erwin Schrödinger’s famous cat was never both alive and dead.
The paradox arose from a category mistake: the confusion of structured potential with actualised instance.
That clarification resolves the cat.
But the cat is not the real issue.
The deeper claim is this:
Most interpretative crises in quantum mechanics arise from the same confusion.
The Pattern of Inflation
Across the twentieth century, quantum theory generated a series of conceptual shocks:
-
Superposition
-
Wavefunction collapse
-
Entanglement
-
Measurement problem
-
Many-worlds branching
In each case, a formal structure articulating possible instances was reinterpreted as a description of ontic substance.
A theory of structured potential was treated as a picture of what is literally occurring “out there.”
Once that move is made, paradox proliferates.
If the wavefunction is taken as an ontic entity, then it must either:
-
physically collapse,
-
branch into multiple universes,
-
or coexist with hidden variables.
Each proposal attempts to stabilise what was destabilised by the initial conflation.
But the destabilisation was not in the world.
It was in the grammar.
Superposition Revisited
When a system is described as being in superposition, the formalism specifies a structured space of mutually exclusive possible actualisations.
Interference phenomena confirm that this structure constrains what can be actualised. The mathematics has teeth.
But constraint is not co-actuality.
The empirical success of the formalism demonstrates that structured potential has determinate form.
It does not demonstrate that incompatible phenomenal states coexist.
The step from “formal multiplicity” to “ontological multiplicity” is not demanded by experiment.
It is an interpretative inflation.
The Measurement Problem as a Category Error
The so-called “measurement problem” arises when we ask:
How does a superposed state become a definite outcome?
The question presupposes that superposition is already an ontic state requiring transformation.
But if superposition is structured potential — a theory of possible instances — then no transformation is required.
Actualisation is not a physical process occurring within potential.
It is the perspectival cut from potential to instance.
The “problem” dissolves once we stop asking how one kind of being turns into another.
Nothing turns.
A different level of construal is in play.
Entanglement Without Metaphysical Telepathy
Entanglement is often treated as evidence that reality is fundamentally non-local in a mysterious way — as though particles communicate instantaneously across space.
But what entanglement demonstrates is that the structured potential of a composite system cannot be decomposed into independent subpotentials.
The structure of possibility is relational.
Again, the mathematics specifies constraints on possible joint actualisations.
It does not require spooky ontic transmission.
The crisis appears when relational potential is mistaken for hidden causal traffic.
The Habit of Reification
Why does this pattern recur?
Because modern scientific culture inherits a metaphysical reflex:
Formal description is assumed to mirror ontic substance.
When physics produces a mathematical articulation of possibility, we instinctively treat it as a literal map of what exists independently of description.
But structured potential is not a thing among things.
It is not a cloud in space.
It is not an invisible fluid evolving in time.
It is a formal articulation of possible instances.
When that articulation is reified, paradox follows.
From Incompleteness to Indeterminacy
In 1931, Kurt Gödel demonstrated that sufficiently powerful formal systems cannot be both complete and consistent. The shock was interpreted as a wound in reason.
But the deeper lesson was about the structure of possibility: no formal articulation exhausts its potential instances.
Quantum theory reveals something analogous.
No structured potential collapses into a single ontic substance without remainder. Its formal multiplicity cannot be reduced to one static picture of “what is really happening.”
In both cases, the temptation is to convert formal openness into metaphysical drama.
But openness is not drama.
It is structure.
Physics Within Structured Potential
Physics does not describe an ontic substance evolving behind appearances.
It articulates structured potential.
The wavefunction is not a ghostly object.
It is not a hidden fluid.
It is not a branching cosmos in disguise.
It is a formal articulation of possible instances.
Superposition is not a zombie state.
It is formal multiplicity.
Collapse is not an explosion in reality.
It is the cut from theory to instance.
The crisis in quantum interpretation was never a crisis in nature.
It was a crisis in grammar.
We mistook potential for instance.
We reified theory into substance.
And then we attempted to stabilise the contradictions we ourselves had generated.
The Evolution of Possibility
Seen clearly, quantum theory does not reveal a fractured universe.
It reveals that actuality is always drawn from a structured field of possibility that exceeds any one instance.
This is not indeterminacy as chaos.
It is indeterminacy as openness.
Potential is not a vague cloud awaiting resolution.
It is articulated structure.
It constrains what may be actualised.
But it is never exhausted by what is actualised.
This is the same structural insight that surfaced in the reframing of Kurt Gödel’s incompleteness theorems.
Formal systems exceed their derivations.
Structured potential exceeds its instances.
Possibility evolves not by accumulating more “stuff,” but by the ongoing articulation of new structured potentials within which new instances may be actualised.
Quantum mechanics did not shatter reality.
It revealed that reality is not a block of substance but an ongoing relation between potential and instance.
The Structural Schema
If the confusion is grammatical, the remedy is structural clarity.
We can state it plainly:
System → Cut → Instance
-
The system is structured potential: a theory of possible instances.
-
The cut is perspectival: the shift in level of construal.
-
The instance is actualised phenomenon.
Superposition belongs to the first.
Collapse belongs to the second.
Definite outcomes belong to the third.
Once these are kept distinct, the supposed paradoxes of quantum mechanics lose their theatrical force.
There was never a half-dead cat.
There was never a metaphysical explosion at measurement.
There was never a branching infinity forced upon us by experiment.
There was a failure to distinguish potential from instance.
And once that distinction is restored, the crisis dissolves — not because the universe becomes simple, but because our thinking becomes precise.
The revolution was not in physics.
It was in our understanding of possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment