Thermodynamics Without Time: 4 Energy Without Loss

If entropy is not disorder, and the arrow of time is not temporal, then one final intuition must be examined.

It is the intuition that energy is used up.

Engines run down.

Batteries drain.

Stars burn out.

Energy seems to disappear, or at least to become unavailable in ways that feel like loss.

Thermodynamics itself denies this. Energy is conserved.

Yet everyday experience insists otherwise.

This final post shows how both claims can be true without contradiction.

---

1. The apparent paradox

The first law of thermodynamics tells us that energy is conserved.

The second law seems to tell us that energy degrades.

Together, they generate a familiar puzzle:

If energy is conserved, why does the world run down?

Standard answers appeal to “energy quality”, “useful work”, or “free energy”. These notions are technically precise, but conceptually they often smuggle back the same imagery of loss and decay we have already set aside.

From the relational perspective, the paradox dissolves once energy is re-specified.

---

2. Energy as relational availability

In the earlier series on gravity and inertia, energy was already reframed as relational availability.

Energy does not name a substance stored inside objects.

It names the range of re-actualisations a configuration can support.

A high-energy configuration is one that can be re-cut in many impactful ways.

A low-energy configuration is one whose re-cuts are tightly constrained.

Nothing has been lost.

What has changed is where availability sits.

---

3. Why useful energy disappears

Consider a simple case: a hot object cooling in a cold room.

Energy flows.

Temperatures equalise.

The total energy remains the same.

What disappears is not energy, but concentration.

When energy is highly localised, it supports many asymmetric re-cuts: engines can run, gradients can be exploited, work can be done.

Once dispersed, those same possibilities require extraordinarily specific coordination.

Availability has not vanished.

It has become relationally expensive to access.

---

4. Entropy revisited

We can now see how entropy and energy fit together.

As entropy increases, relational availability becomes more evenly distributed across constraints.

This does not reduce the total availability of the system.

It redistributes it into forms that no longer support easy directional re-actualisations.

Energy is conserved.

Usefulness is not.

That is not a physical tragedy.

It is a structural fact.

---

5. Gravity, inertia, and thermodynamic flattening

The connection to earlier series can now be made explicit.

• Inertia describes flat availability: configurations that persist because nothing strongly biases re-cutting.

• Gravity describes gradiented availability: configurations that locally constrain re-cutting paths.

• Thermodynamic equilibration describes the flattening of availability gradients.

In each case, nothing is consumed.

Constraints are rearranged.

---

6. Why nothing ever really runs out

Stars do not exhaust energy.

Engines do not destroy it.

The universe does not leak it away.

What changes is the ease with which availability can be gathered into exploitable gradients.

The cost of reconstruction grows.

The cheap paths vanish.

Loss is an appearance created by constraint redistribution.

---

7. Closing the series

Across these four posts, we have removed several deeply entrenched assumptions:

• That entropy is disorder

• That time pushes processes forward

• That irreversibility is temporal

• That energy is lost

In their place, we have found a single organising principle:

Asymmetries of relational availability across successive construals.

Thermodynamics does not describe the flow of time.

It describes the shape of constraint space.

Nothing runs down.

It simply becomes harder to do certain things again.

And that difficulty is not temporal.

It is relational.