Platforms do not merely transmit content. They train what can be noticed, understood, repeated, and shared. From algorithmic aesthetics to compressed narratives, engagement metrics to phantom belonging, they optimise the field of intelligibility itself.
The work of this series has been to illuminate how these mechanisms operate — not in abstraction, but as forces shaping everyday participation, attention, and taste.
From Mechanics to Ethics
-
Mechanics of Coordination: Platforms reward uptake, not truth; style and rhythm, not content; speed and recognisability, not reflection.
-
Flattening of Time: Narrative compression and rapid circulation erode revisability, producing a “permanent present” in which alignment stabilises automatically.
-
Phantom Belonging: Coordination occurs without awareness, responsibility, or care, creating the illusion of influence and community.
Against this backdrop, visibility is not power, engagement is not comprehension, and virality often reinforces existing structures rather than challenging them.
The Relational Approach to Subversion
Subversion today must operate after optimisation, within the patterns the system already shapes. This means:
-
Intervening in intelligibility, not content: altering style, pacing, and rhythm to change what is taken up.
-
Preserving revisability: slowing circulation, introducing ambiguity, resisting instant absorption.
-
Ethical field awareness: considering how every interaction affects the conditions of uptake, alignment, and coordination.
Subversion is subtle, relational, and systemic — it reshapes possibility itself.
Responsibility as Practice
In platformed fields, ethics is distributed. Responsibility arises not from intention alone, but from effects on the field:
-
Every like, share, comment, and pause contributes to alignment.
-
Ethical participation involves attending to patterns of uptake, amplifying care, and maintaining conditions for reconsideration and reflection.
-
Slowness, opacity, and style are as ethically significant as the content of any message.
Possibility Remains
Despite compression, optimisation, and automated alignment, possibility is not extinguished. Platforms may stabilise the field, but relational tactics — attentiveness, slowness, form disruption, and care for uptake — preserve space for reflection, subtle subversion, and responsible coordination.
The ultimate insight of this series is simple but profound:
To act responsibly is to notice the field, intervene where possible, and preserve the conditions under which meaning, alignment, and possibility can emerge.
Platforms train attention, taste, and coordination, often without awareness. Relational ethics shows that conscious engagement is a radical act — one that maintains revisability, subverts automation, and ensures that possibility remains alive in conditions designed to compress it.
No comments:
Post a Comment