Platformed Intelligibility: 8 Subversion After Optimisation

By the time content circulates on platforms, much has already been shaped. Algorithms have optimised attention, affect, and style; visibility, recognisability, and uptake have been measured.

In such an environment, traditional acts of opposition — counter-messaging, protest posts, or viral statements — are largely neutralised. The system absorbs them, stabilises coordination, and appears unchanged.

Subversion, therefore, must shift its focus: not content, but conditions of intelligibility.

---

Optimisation Absorbs Opposition

Platforms do not simply filter content; they structure what survives. Engagement, visibility, and style are all pressure points that select for forms that can propagate effortlessly.

Consequently:

• Radical or novel content may appear viral, but its form is immediately standardised

• Dissent can reinforce familiar rhythms, rather than challenge them

• The system learns the shape of opposition, neutralising its destabilising potential

Subversion cannot rely on being loud, visible, or fast. It must operate under the radar of optimisation itself.

---

Intelligibility Repair as Subversion

True subversion today requires repairing what is intelligible:

• Altering the conditions under which ideas, affects, and styles are taken up

• Resisting automatic alignment by introducing subtle complexity, ambiguity, or delay

• Making familiar forms temporarily unrecognisable, prompting reconsideration

This is not chaos. It is targeted perturbation of the coordination field.

---

Strategies of Post-Optimisation Subversion

1. Opacity and Ambiguity

   • Avoid immediate recognisability

   • Force engagement that requires interpretation, not reflex

2. Pacing and Delay

   • Slow content circulation to preserve revisability

   • Resist instant feedback loops that compress attention

3. Stylistic Reconfiguration

   • Shift rhythm, tone, or form to destabilise habitual uptake

   • Introduce subtle misalignments that expand perceptual space

4. Relational Awareness

   • Track field effects rather than metrics

   • Intervene where uptake shapes the conditions of intelligibility

Subversion is no longer about winning arguments. It is about reshaping what can be meaningfully noticed, absorbed, and repeated.

---

Subversion Without Collapse

This approach preserves the system’s function while opening space for possibility. It is inherently responsible, because it targets the field, not individuals. It avoids chaos but still disrupts automatic alignment, creating pockets where reflection, ambiguity, and deliberation can survive.

---

Closing

Subversion after optimisation is subtle, relational, and strategic. It does not fight algorithms with outrage or volume. It works on the fabric of intelligibility itself:

Not what is said, but what can be understood.

Not what is seen, but what can be re-taken up.

In the next post, we will examine the ethical stakes of participation in platformed fields, closing the series by returning to responsibility and care in conditions where alignment is automated.