Having shown how value systems act on meaning through pressure and recruitment, we can now examine where this action becomes visible.
It becomes visible at the moment of uptake.
Uptake is not understanding
Uptake is often mistaken for comprehension or agreement.
It is neither.
Uptake is the social response that determines whether a construal:
continues,
stabilises,
or disappears.
A meaning can be fully intelligible and still fail to be taken up.
Social filtering
Every interpersonal act of meaning passes through a social filter.
Responses — explicit or implicit — determine:
whether a contribution is acknowledged,
whether it is ignored,
whether it is corrected, ridiculed, rewarded, or punished.
This filtering is not interpretive.
It is regulatory.
Sanction without judgement
Sanction does not require conscious judgement.
It can take the form of:
silence,
dismissal,
withdrawal,
exclusion,
or repetition and reinforcement.
These responses exert pressure without explanation.
Meaning is shaped not by what is said about it, but by what happens after it is offered.
The risk of speaking
Because uptake is uncertain, speaking is always risky.
Every act of interpersonal meaning exposes the speaker to:
misalignment,
rejection,
loss of standing,
or unexpected consequence.
This risk explains why interpersonal meaning feels consequential even when no explicit rule is at stake.
Anticipated uptake
Over time, participants learn to anticipate uptake.
They adjust construals in advance:
softening claims,
choosing safer formulations,
avoiding certain topics altogether.
This anticipation is not obedience to rules.
It is attunement to pressure.
When meaning disappears
Meanings do not fail because they are false.
They fail because they are not taken up.
Uptake determines persistence, not correctness.
This is why some meanings vanish without ever being argued against.
Looking ahead
Uptake and sanction do not always align smoothly with meaning.
Sometimes they pull in different directions.
Post 5: Obligation Without Representation will show how the felt force of "ought" emerges from these dynamics — without invoking rules, norms-as-content, or internalised codes.
No comments:
Post a Comment