-
Managed Populations examined governance in liberal democracies: how citizens, once central, are structurally displaced by the imperatives of administration, data, and risk.
-
The Age of Optimisation examined institutions across domains — corporations, universities, healthcare, media, and the self — showing how measurable performance gradually displaces intended beneficiaries.
Viewed together, a pattern emerges: systems persist, participation continues, yet structural primacy shifts toward internal logics — whether governance metrics or optimisation metrics. The beneficiaries remain visible, rhetorically central, but structurally secondary.
The Structural Homology
| Domain / Series | Declared Beneficiary | Emergent Metric / Logic | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Populations | Citizens | Governance performance, compliance | Optimises for system stability, not citizen agency |
| Corporations | Consumers | Shareholder return | Optimises for capital performance |
| Universities | Students | Rankings, research metrics | Optimises for institutional success |
| Healthcare | Patients | Throughput, outcomes | Optimises for operational efficiency |
| Media | Audience | Engagement metrics | Optimises for attention |
| Psychological Self | Self / Identity | Social feedback, measurable performance | Self aligns with system’s logic |
Across all cases, the same structural mechanism appears: systems function, participation persists, and declared purpose survives rhetorically, yet the centre of gravity shifts toward measurable performance itself.
Optimisation in Education: From Learning to Performance
Education provides a particularly vivid human-scale example. Metrics intended to measure learning — test scores, grades, rankings — can subtly transform the purpose of education itself:
-
Students learn to optimise for the metric, rather than for understanding or growth.
-
Behaviour becomes performative: “doing what earns approval,” rather than “engaging with meaning.”
-
Moral and civic education risks being expressed as visible compliance, virtue-signalling, or rigid adherence to institutional definitions of social justice, rather than lived, reflective practice.
The effect is a kind of teacher’s pet syndrome on a societal scale: lives are performed to please authority, with the original beneficiary — curiosity, growth, engagement, or genuine justice — displaced by the metric of external validation.
The Quietly Unsettling Implications
This insight links the two series more directly:
-
In governance, citizens participate, but the structural centre is the system’s survival and measured performance.
-
In optimisation systems, across domains, beneficiaries participate, but structural primacy migrates toward the metric itself.
-
Internally, individuals mirror this logic: they optimise behaviour, moral choices, and self-presentation to satisfy measurable indicators, authority, or social perception.
Metrics mediate life. Function persists. Participation is visible. Yet structural displacement quietly unfolds.
Looking Forward
The bridge prepares the way for broader investigation:
-
How do optimisation logics evolve across domains, from institutions to interiority?
-
How can we recognise and preserve structural primacy for the intended beneficiary?
-
How might insight, reflection, and design intervene in systems that self-reinforce through metrics?
The task ahead is analytic, practical, and existential. By tracing how optimisation reshapes attention, priority, and purpose, we can see both the structural displacement of beneficiaries and the spaces of possibility where agency, reflection, and meaningful participation remain.
No comments:
Post a Comment