The previous post established a strict boundary: value systems do not mean.
This post explains how, despite that boundary, value nevertheless acts upon meaning.
The relation is indirect, structural, and decisive.
No interpretation, only pressure
Value systems — biological and social — do not interpret symbols or construe phenomena.
They exert pressure.
This pressure does not add content to meaning. It reshapes the conditions of construal.
Meaning remains symbolic and relational.
What changes is the space in which meaning can occur.
Recruitment, not expression
A common mistake is to treat meaning as the expression of value.
This is wrong.
Value systems instead recruit meaning practices as their operational surface.
Language, gesture, ritual, and interaction are not carriers of value; they are sites where value systems exert influence by shaping uptake, viability, and persistence.
Narrowing the field of construal
One primary way value acts on meaning is by narrowing the field of possible construals.
Certain interpretations become:
safer,
more viable,
more readily taken up.
Others become:
costly,
unintelligible,
or actively sanctioned.
Nothing semantic has changed.
The field has been reshaped.
Stabilisation and repetition
Value systems favour repetition.
Construals that align with existing coordination structures are more likely to recur.
Over time, this produces:
apparent stability of meaning,
conventional interpretations,
sedimented intelligibility.
Stability here is an effect of pressure, not stored meaning.
Anticipation and self-regulation
Once pressures are familiar, participants anticipate them.
Construal begins to self-regulate:
meanings are pre-emptively adjusted,
interpretations are avoided before they are attempted,
speech is shaped by expected uptake.
Value has not entered meaning.
It has shaped its horizon.
Biological and social pressures together
Biological viability pressures (attention, arousal, safety) and social coordination pressures (norms, roles, expectations) operate simultaneously.
Together, they produce the felt weight of interpersonal meaning.
Meaning remains interpretive.
Constraint remains systemic.
Why this matters
Without this account, interpersonal meaning either becomes mysterious or collapses into norm-following.
By recognising recruitment and pressure, we can explain:
why meaning feels consequential,
why some interpretations are risky,
why freedom of meaning is always situated.
Looking ahead
With the mechanism now visible, we can turn to one of its most immediate effects.
Post 4: Uptake, Sanction, and the Risk of Speaking will examine how social systems filter meaning through response — making some meanings persist and others disappear.
No comments:
Post a Comment