Earlier we encountered myth as a major transformation in symbolic activity.
Myth organised worlds.
It connected events.
Structured meanings.
Opened possibilities for collective activity.
Yet modern thought often imagines a familiar story.
Myth belonged to the past.
Science replaced it.
Reason gradually displaced imagination.
The movement appears straightforward:
first myth
then knowledge
The image feels reassuring.
Humanity supposedly awakened from narrative into reality.
Yet a peculiar question emerges:
Why do stories continue organising worlds?
Because they clearly do.
Nations live inside stories.
Economies live inside stories.
Institutions live inside stories.
Identities live inside stories.
Even futures live inside stories.
The supposedly obsolete phenomenon refuses to disappear.
The object trap
Object-thinking reaches for a familiar explanation.
Perhaps myths are simply false beliefs.
Descriptions mistaken for reality.
Primitive attempts at explanation.
The problem appears solved.
Science explains reality.
Myth merely decorates it.
Yet difficulties quickly emerge.
Because myths often continue shaping action even when their factual status becomes secondary.
People organise themselves around stories.
Sacrifice for stories.
Build institutions around stories.
Imagine futures through stories.
Something more than explanation appears to be occurring.
The strange appearance
Myths behave curiously.
They do not merely describe worlds.
They organise worlds.
They shape expectations.
Orient activity.
Coordinate possibilities.
Provide horizons within which actions become meaningful.
The monster quietly returns.
Not because myths are irrational.
Because stories increasingly appear to participate in reality rather than merely reflecting it.
The relational turn
Suppose myths are not primarily failed descriptions.
Suppose myths are organisations of possibility.
Then something shifts.
Myths no longer appear as mistaken theories awaiting correction.
They become ways of organising collective becoming.
Narratives.
Symbols.
Practices.
Values.
Memories.
Imagined futures.
None alone constitutes myth.
Yet through their ongoing organisation, worlds become available.
The question therefore changes.
Not:
Is this story true?
But:
What possibilities does this story make available?
The revelation
And now something curious becomes visible.
Perhaps modernity never escaped myth.
Perhaps it simply generated new ones.
Stories of progress.
Stories of markets.
Stories of nations.
Stories of technology.
Stories of endless growth.
Stories of individuality.
The issue was never whether human beings would live within myths.
The issue was always:
which myths organise possibility?
And suddenly the horizon itself begins becoming visible again.
Because perhaps the future will not emerge merely through technologies or discoveries.
Perhaps it will also emerge through stories not yet fully imagined.
Stories capable of organising possibilities that currently remain difficult to see.
No comments:
Post a Comment