Readers of the Liora pieces may have noticed a shift.
In earlier scenes, something moves in the shallows—a faint gathering, a pressure that suggests the near-appearance of form. It comes close, slips, and cannot be held. Later, this gives way to a different kind of space: a stair that rises and falls at once, a structure that does not dissolve but refuses to resolve.
These are not simply different settings.
They are two ways of entering the same instability.
To name them (carefully), we might call them two aesthetic fields, after the sensibilities they most closely resemble: one associated with Mervyn Peake, the other with M. C. Escher.
But the names are only provisional. What matters is the difference in how the “almost” behaves.
I. The Current (a Peakean field)
In the shallows, nothing presents itself as stable.
There is a sense of something about to be: a glimmer, a pressure, a gathering that never quite completes. When Liora first reaches for it, her hand closes on nothing. The experience presents itself as loss—something that might have been caught, had she been quicker.
“This time, she reached.…But where she had felt that pressure—there was nothing.”
Here, instability takes the form of vanishing. The phenomenon cannot sustain itself long enough to become an object. It appears only as something slipping away.
And yet, as the scene unfolds, Liora’s relation changes. She begins not to grasp, but to remain within the movement itself:
“Her hand did not close.There was nothing to hold.And yet… the sense of ‘something’ was more vivid than before.”
What shifts is not the presence of a hidden object, but the mode of engagement. The “current” is not something in the water; it is the way the field of experience gathers and loosens under a particular construal.
II. The Stair (an Escherian field)
When the setting transforms, the instability does not disappear. It changes form.
On the stair, nothing slips away. Instead, nothing settles.
Up and down coincide. Each step is both before and after. The paradox does not resolve over time—it is structural, built into the relations that define the space.
“When she looked back, the path descended.When she looked forward, it climbed.”
Here, instability takes the form of non-resolution. The phenomenon persists, but cannot be completed into a coherent whole.
The net-bearer’s strategy carries over. He still seeks a point of capture—a place where the crossing of directions might yield something stable. But the attempt fails differently now:
“Every point was such a crossing…There was no place where the movement converged, because it was already converging everywhere.”
Nothing vanishes. Nothing can be held.
III. Neither and Both
At first glance, these two fields seem opposed.
In one, the “almost” cannot be retained.
In the other, it cannot be resolved.
But as the pieces develop, this opposition begins to loosen.
Liora does not move from one world to another in any simple sense. The shift from current to stair is not a transition between distinct domains, but a reconfiguration of how the same instability is held.
This is why the question—are they the same?—proves difficult to answer.
What changes is not an underlying object, but the cut through which the field is actualised.
IV. Letting the Field Hold Itself
By the final movement, even the distinction between these modes begins to fall away.
Liora no longer tries to grasp what slips, nor to resolve what cannot be resolved. She does not choose between the two.
Instead, she attends to the condition that makes both possible.
“There was only this:the almost—no longer before or after—but here…”
At this point, the “current” and the “stair” are no longer separate figures. They are different articulations of a single condition: the way in which something can come close to being without ever stabilising as a thing.
V. Reading as Attunement
What, then, is the reader to do with this?
Not interpret in the usual sense. Not extract a hidden meaning or resolve the paradox.
Rather, to notice.
To become sensitive to the slight differences in how something appears:
as slipping
as looping
as almost resolving
as almost vanishing
The stories do not present a system to be understood. They cultivate an attunement—a way of remaining with the almost without forcing it into form.
If there is a lesson here, it is a quiet one:
No comments:
Post a Comment