Having identified topological thresholds (Post 4), we now ask:
How does a horizon actually reorganise its global constraint topology?
The answer lies in the meta-cascade—the propagation of structural change across scales, recomposing the horizon into a new coherent configuration.
1. From Threshold to Cascade
Cross-scale pressure at the threshold produces:
-
Stress propagation through hybrid condensations.
-
Reinforcement or dissolution of meta-clusters.
-
Rearticulation of adjacency relations across the horizon.
A meta-cascade is not random:
-
It follows structural feasibility.
-
It respects invariants wherever possible.
-
It propagates change along saturated pathways.
Thus, horizon recomposition is lawful yet transformative.
2. Rewriting Constraint Grammar
During a meta-cascade:
-
Old grammar rules are reparameterised.
-
Previously coherent forms may become incoherent under the new structure.
-
New forms of adjacency, coupling, and feasible trajectory emerge.
Constraint grammar is now fluid at the horizon scale, but still lawful.
3. Stabilisation of New Invariants
Once the meta-cascade completes:
-
A new set of structural invariants stabilises.
-
Feasibility gradients are re-established under the new topology.
-
Dimensional expansion or reparameterisation consolidates.
This is horizon recomposition: a global condensation of new constraints emerges from prior tension.
4. Emergent Degrees of Freedom
The recomposed horizon contains new axes of structured potential:
-
Previously latent couplings stabilise as legitimate adjacency.
-
Hybrid condensations recombine into higher-order meta-clusters.
-
Feasible trajectory space is expanded and reparameterised, enabling forms of actualisation impossible in the previous horizon.
This is innovation at the horizon level, without randomness.
5. Continuity Preserved
Despite apparent discontinuity:
-
Local trajectories within the horizon evolve continuously.
-
Existing condensations adapt to new grammar.
-
Path dependence maintains partial continuity with the prior configuration.
Disruption is structurally bounded, not chaotic.
6. Structural Memory and Irreversibility
Horizon recomposition leaves persistent traces:
-
Some adjacency relations are irreversibly ratcheted.
-
Past density accumulations influence future meta-cascades.
-
Feasible trajectories are contingent on prior horizon configurations.
Memory is embedded structurally, not narratively.
7. Conceptual Summary
Meta-cascade and horizon recomposition:
-
Propagate threshold stress across scales.
-
Reparameterise constraint grammar.
-
Stabilise new invariants.
-
Introduce emergent degrees of freedom.
-
Maintain lawful continuity while producing global discontinuity.
-
Encode structural memory for future evolution.
This is the mechanism of meta-topological evolution: how the horizon of structured potential rewrites itself.
8. Next Step
Next post:
Post 6 — Path Dependence and Irreversibility
We examine:
-
How accumulated history constrains future horizon evolution.
-
How structural ratchets form at the meta-level.
-
The balance between continuity, irreversibility, and further potential for reorganisation.
We move from transformation to long-term evolution of the horizon itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment