The recent series explored how validity, truth, proof, representationalism, and objectivity can be reconstructed once we abandon hierarchical assumptions. A subtle but crucial insight emerges from that exploration: relational ontology entails directional epistemology.
1. The Ontological Starting Point
A relational ontology conceives reality as:
-
Structured potential: the world is not a collection of self-contained substances, but a field of possibilities.
-
Constitutive relations: entities and phenomena are not independent; they exist through their relations.
-
Directional complementarity: any instance can be viewed both as actualisation and as potential, depending on perspective.
From this standpoint, there is no “outside” vantage from which the world can be compared to representations or theories. Ontology is field-like, not ladder-like.
2. The Epistemic Consequence
If reality is relational:
-
Every knowledge position is positioned relative to others.
-
No position is absolutely foundational.
This produces a directional epistemology:
-
Knowledge is not ascent toward a detached metalevel.
-
Validity becomes constraint within positioned potential.
-
Truth becomes durable adequacy across repositioning.
-
Proof becomes demonstration of inevitability within structured space.
-
Objectivity becomes robustness across perspectives.
In short, epistemic rigour is preserved — not by climbing, but by navigating and stabilising within a relational field.
3. Why This Matters
This is not relativism. Constraint, coherence, and durability remain central. What changes is the source of rigour: it is no longer anchored in foundations, elevated vantage points, or correspondence to an external reality. It is distributed throughout the field of relations.
Furthermore, it aligns epistemology with ontology:
-
Being is relational.
-
Knowing is relational.
Knowledge is no longer external commentary on reality; it is a mode of relational participation within reality itself. This preserves realism, allows for error, and maintains intersubjective agreement — all without hierarchy or transcendence.
4. A Forward Perspective
Recognising that relational ontology entails directional epistemology opens new horizons:
-
Inquiry becomes active navigation within structured potential.
-
Methodology becomes a matter of positioning, testing, and stabilising constraints.
-
The distinction between phenomena and theory is maintained, but without elevating theory to ultimate status.
This is not the end of the story. It is a synthesis that provides a stable foundation for exploring:
-
Science without foundations
-
Semiotics without mirrors
-
Epistemology without ladders
And it points toward a more general view: all forms of knowledge can be approached directionally, reflecting the fundamental relationality of reality.
5. Conclusion
Relational ontology reshapes the very conditions of knowing. By attending to relations, positions, and constraints, we preserve rigour, truth, and objectivity — all without requiring elevation. Directional epistemology is the natural, necessary consequence of this ontological vision.
It offers both clarity and freedom: a way to navigate structured potential without retreating to imagined foundations or detached mirrors.
No comments:
Post a Comment