Ethics begins where politics ends — not in principle, but in consequence.
Once a decision has been made, action taken, and a future selected, something always remains. A cost is borne. A harm is deferred. A value is violated in the name of another. This remainder is not accidental.
It is structural.
And it is what ethical systems most urgently attempt to eliminate.
Moral Remainder as Unavoidable
A moral remainder appears whenever:
-
goods conflict,
-
harms cannot be fully avoided,
-
responsibility is unevenly distributed,
-
innocence is unavailable.
No ethical framework can prevent this. To act is to choose, and to choose is to foreclose.
The Ethical Cut
Ethical systems enact cuts to stabilise action after the fact:
-
justification over regret,
-
principle over consequence,
-
intention over outcome,
-
rule over exception.
These cuts do not remove harm. They reassign moral weight so that action remains intelligible.
Ethics here functions as containment.
Intolerance as Moral Defence
The intolerance of moral remainder emerges when unresolved cost threatens moral identity:
-
guilt becomes unbearable,
-
responsibility diffuses uncomfortably,
-
blame must be located or expelled,
-
ambiguity threatens self-conception as “good”.
Ethical discourse hardens in response:
-
absolutism replaces deliberation,
-
purity displaces responsibility,
-
moral certainty substitutes for moral attention.
This is not hypocrisy. It is protection.
The Fantasy of Clean Hands
Many ethical systems promise what they cannot deliver:
-
action without residue,
-
justice without loss,
-
virtue without complicity.
These promises are expressions of intolerance toward remainder.
They allow agents to act without acknowledging the harm their action necessitates.
But the remainder persists.
Where the Remainder Goes
Unacknowledged moral remainder is displaced:
-
onto victims, as inevitability,
-
onto enemies, as moral failure,
-
onto history, as necessity,
-
onto systems, as abstraction.
Displacement preserves moral coherence at the cost of ethical responsiveness.
Reading Ethics Relationally
A relational ethics does not aim to eliminate remainder.
It asks instead:
-
where the cost fell,
-
who continues to carry it,
-
how justification functioned as containment,
-
and what remains ethically unresolved.
Endurance Without Resolution
Ethical maturity is not the achievement of innocence.
It is the capacity to endure:
-
unresolved responsibility,
-
persistent harm,
-
imperfect outcomes,
-
continuing obligation.
Intolerance marks the point where this endurance fails.
Closing
Ethics is not the discipline that removes moral remainder.
It is the discipline that teaches us how not to look away from it.
Where moral discourse becomes rigid, punitive, or absolutist, the remainder is pressing hardest.
To read ethical intolerance relationally is to see where action has outpaced justification — and where responsibility still waits, unmet.
No comments:
Post a Comment