In the oldest stories told among metaphysicians, there is a kingdom called Grammar, where all things are named before they are seen.
In this kingdom, every object arrives at court and is granted a decree:
“You shall have your qualities.”
Shape is given. Colour is assigned. Weight is recorded. And above all, each thing is issued a final, most mysterious possession: Existence.
The Surface Myth: The Royal Ledger of Being
The scribes of Grammar maintain a vast ledger called The Register of Possessions.
In it, every entity is listed twice:
- once as what it is (stone, tree, river, thought)
- and once as whether it has existence
So the philosophers of the kingdom begin to wonder:
Is existence something that things possess?
They imagine existence as a rare and invisible jewel.
Some things, they think, must hold it tightly. Others must lack it entirely. A thing, in this view, is like a chest into which existence may or may not be placed.
Thus arises a great project:
to determine who has the jewel, and who does not.
The Hidden Myth: The Error of the Jewel
But there is a forgotten origin to the ledger.
Long ago, before the scribes arrived, there were no possessions—only occurrences of articulation, fleeting but structured.
To speak of something was not to assign it attributes, but to bring it into legible relation within the unfolding field.
The word “exists” was not a seal of ownership.
It was a signal of arrival within the domain of articulation.
But over time, the scribes misunderstood their own marks.
They mistook a verb for a commodity.
They treated a grammatical gesture as a transferable object.
And so existence was promoted—from condition of appearance—to property in the royal ledger.
The Deep Myth: The Court of Misplaced Grammar
At the heart of the kingdom stands the great hall of Predication, where everything is spoken of in terms of possession:
- X has shape
- X has colour
- X has being
And from this hall, a quiet distortion spreads:
if everything is something that has its qualities, then even being itself must be something that can be held.
But no one notices the contradiction:
to “have existence” is already to be within existence.
The jewel cannot be possessed from outside the treasury in which all possession is possible.
The scribes are not wrong about differences between things.
They are wrong about the idea that difference requires ownership.
The Dissolution of the Quest
One day, a wanderer enters the archive and asks:
“Show me the register of those who possess existence itself.”
The archivists search all the ledgers.
But there is no such entry.
Not because it is hidden—but because the question presupposes a separation that never existed.
There is no shelf for existence.
No vault where it is stored.
No bearer who carries it like a token.
Only entries that are already, in their appearing, instances of being recorded at all.
The distinction collapses.
Not between existent and nonexistent things—
but between having existence and being what is already actualised within relational articulation.
What Remains
The kingdom is not abolished.
Trees still grow. Stones still endure. Words are still spoken.
But the Royal Ledger is quietly rewritten:
not as a list of possessions,
but as a field of ongoing actualisations, where nothing first receives existence and then becomes real.
Instead:
- to be is not to possess existence
- to be is to be enacted within relational structure
- existence is not added—it is the very condition of articulation itself
Closing Image
And so the myth ends where the misunderstanding began:
in a courtroom where nothing ever owned existence in the first place,
because there was never a separate thing called existence to be owned—
only the continuous unfolding of what is, as it becomes speakable within the living grammar of the world.
No comments:
Post a Comment